|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Huey www.juzaphoto.com/p/Huey  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R Pros: Solid construction, virtually no distortion, sharpness superlative build quality exceptional. Cons: None (oh, the price? ...) Opinion: I state that I come by the combination Canon 5D mk II - 35mm f / 1.4, and with no little amazement I see that this objective has a higher quality than that of the noble lens Canon (blurred except that it is not very "mushy"). For those looking for quality without compromise this lens is a must: I could not part with it even when I took a Fujifilm X100T, which has the same focal length 23mm (fixed). Someone complains hood, perhaps this aspect Fujifilm could have done more, given that it is a slow "premium", but for me it's also okay. sent on April 04, 2015 |
 | Minolta MD Rokkor 58mm f/1.4 Pros: price, construction, maximum aperture, bokeh, vintage feeling Cons: soft wide open, just engraved on APS-C, little resistance to flare (coma obvious) rn Opinion: Taken together with a much Fujifilm X-T1, is soft at full aperture with an effect "glow" that disappears at f / 2.8; photos have a low microcontrast and then the image is not very engraved on APS-C (to be expected, it is with a view A resolution from full frame, APS-C fatigue) .rnAlla end, however, it is precisely the 'vintage effect that is a winner, otherwise one takes a Fujifilm 56mm f / 1.4 and peace: D sent on December 27, 2014 |
 | Fujifilm X-T1 Pros: EVF spectacular AF responsive and reliable enough, dials and buttons in the right places, good high ISO performance, excellent ergonomics and materials, wi-fi (remote control from your smartphone is fabulous!) Cons: 4-way pad keys are too small and not very "sensitive"; ring EV + / - diopter adjustment and poorly placed; Firmware still immature; battery not lasting; jpg mixed in fine detail (so-called effect "watercolor); lack of a touch screen, which would have eased a lot of some operations Opinion: Ordered before the exit, I arrived at the beginning of March, with the 18-55mm kit F/2.8-4. I used only about ten days, after which it went into service for the problem of the "leak", ie the entry of light on the sensor with the door left aperto.rnMi immediately gave a great feeling, well made, responsive , and once metabolized small flaws / little choices intuitive menus, quite straightforward to use. But in all honesty I have to say did not fire the shot that fulmine.rnrnPremetto is my first and the very first mirrorless Fujifilm, so the lack of feeling may be due to the fact it takes time to break a bit 'longer for someone like me that in the last ten years he has only used SLR (both analog and digital), but at the time I was not convinced totalmente.rnrnAlcuni details then I have made up their noses: the ring of the exposure is not "drowned" in the upper frame, as in previous models, so it tends to be moved inadvertently and partially hinders the p8selettore DRIVE, left) and the exposure metering mode (switch right) tend to move often, during transport and use, so we need to keep an eye often. RnrnSegnalo Finally, the aperture ring on the zoom kit, the 18-55 is too "soft" and is positioned as it is easy to accidentally rotate during use. rnrnIn general, the user experience is positive, but for a more in-depth look judgment to come back from ' assistance, when I will use it with the 14mm and the 23mm, which I plan to buy soon. Only then I can give a definitive judgment, which for now is positive but with some reservations. sent on April 09, 2014 |
 | Canon 50D Pros: grip, functions (micro-adjustment MAF), construction, display, burst Cons: Viewfinder (dim and insufficient funds), construction (dust and dirt infiltrate), made in medium and high ISO (from 1600 onwards) Opinion: Joys and sorrows, since little almost 3 years ago I decided to add to my 40D the baby "sister." I immediately noticed how the 50D was more difficult to "tame" and required the optical level higher than the 40D, to make better. But, once the measures taken, gave me great satisfaction, so much to get me to sell the 40D for non-use. Then it sounds contradictory to have entered the "construction" in both the PRO in CONS: if, in fact, on the one hand the 50D gives a general feeling of solidity and is generally well protected from the elements, on the other hand after a while 'intensive exchange of lenses you'll see the dust get between the viewfinder and pentaprism, and stay there! The real sticking point, however (apart from a responsive and accurate autofocus only the center point) is the yield at high ISO when shooting in RAW, even at ISO 1600 are noted in some low-light conditions, a annoying banding in the shadows, it becomes untenable to 3200 and beyond. Sin, because the rest is a machine handyman, thanks also to the considerable burst. Recommended for those who bear the BG (such as size and weight), because the batteries are ciucciate rather quickly, and in extreme conditions (cold) last davero too little. Personally, I hate the BG, because I prefer the maneuverability and lightness, so I fitted a set of batteries "third-party" that last longer than the original, and I solved the problem ;) sent on October 03, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: quality / price ratio, light, space, quiet AF motor Cons: imprecision MAF, construction, lens hood (absent) Opinion: I use it for a while ', and for portraits on APS-C is my lens of choice. Unfortunately my copy suffers from front focus, but thanks to the micro-adjustment available on the 50D is not a big problem: after a session "serious" point adjustment MAF, now it's fine. At full aperture is very soft, especially at the edges you can see a lot of loss of sharpness, but closed from f / 2 to f / 4 brings out the best of themselves. The building is one that is slightly better than the "plasticotto" f/1.8 Canon counterpart, plus a game of ring MAF, denouncing probable future problems of dust and dirt. Moreover, at that price, you can not not complain, even the Sigma equivalent that acts a bit 'better at room temperature and has a more professional building, still costs a good 25-30% more. A lens upgrade candidate, in any case, since it's been around for a little bit and an "upgrade" technology would not hurt. Finally, the usual sore point with all Canon lenses, the lens hood is not included (and having to shell out another 10% more to buy original annoys more than a little, because in this way the final price comes dangerously close to that of the "twin" Sigma, which instead has the lens hood included, in addition to "bag" to keep the lens when it is at rest). sent on October 03, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
