RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Marco Rebesco
www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcoRebesco



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Marco Rebesco


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

tamron_18-400vc_hldTamron 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD

Pros: Versatile, I thought less sharp at 400, from the tests I did in full light.. my problem is not being able to close too much by going into difraction. It has a more robust look than the 16-300 it replaces.

Cons: I miss the ring with distances. Useful at night.

Opinion: I know it's not crisp at 400 at full opening, but photographing during the day is no problem going beyond F8. In fact, in macro I tend to close to have more PDCs. I don't need a blade.. I don't think I have to croppare. Obviously at 400 you have to have a steady hand but from the first tests it does not seem to me to be bad. I do not claim to challenge specialized optics but what I have is enough for me and advances. I would have spent more on a heavier and more sophisticated 15-400.. Lightness for me is a machine, an optics and a battery...

sent on April 07, 2021


tamron_16-300vcTamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

Pros: Versatile.. light even too much... Economic...

Cons: It is, of course, a compromise and it cannot be a blade. Rather.. it's never enough... if it slipped towards a 15.. or about a 400?.. I'd be willing to spend more.. to carry more weight to have an even more pushed lens... there are fixes that are bigger, weigh and cost more....

Opinion: I started from the very light.. Canon IXUS, Olimpus TG-2.. then a Panasonic bridge with a ridiculous sensor... I have sought the best compromise, even though I want maximum flexibility. A decent APS sensor with dynamic range... autonomy and an all-rounder optics as far as possible. I also have a sigma 17-50 2.8... that I use only under special conditions.. where I seek resolution.. a Nikon 18-140.. excellent compromise.. but I can't give up the 16-300.... What different would I like?.. a stronger optics.. more expensive heavier.. to be able to get to 10~12 megapixels effective.. with a 15-400.. or a 15-600... I don't care if it weighs a pound and a half...

sent on October 19, 2020




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me