|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sto.meditando www.juzaphoto.com/p/Sto.meditando  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Lowepro Flipside 500 AW Pros: Space Available, depth of the central part, a large pocket on the back for your things, transportation convenience. Cons: Lace to tie the tripod, however, are not found ricambi.rnForse, in the central compartment, the upper part is tilted too much, and not easily adapts to any body or accessory fotografico.rnQualche internal drawstring more was not bad Opinion: I bought this backpack on Amazon on offer for € 115, because I needed to carry a lot of testing, including a camera body with the psp battery grip her among zoom lenses. More obviously the 4 batteries, two flash, the battery charger for flash.rnrnC'è was everything and also quite good, it has Velcro on all interior walls and even on the longest dividers in addition to having even Velcro at the base of dividers, which allows the diAggrapparsi with Velcro to both sides of both the inner part of the backrest, and this makes it very modulabile.rnrnAnche a pocket on the back of very large, there may very well be a bent thick sweatshirt is a pretty big pocket that contains the tab with the keyboard for the transport of the stand, and on the seabed is present the pocket containing the antipioggia.rnrnInstallati lining are well padded, and have adjustable strings to fasten the backpack on his chest and in vita.rnrnTante outer side mesh pockets is a string for allacciae bottle or stand sideways, but; you can connect the center back, to hold the tripod during transportation comma in addition to snare the tripod with closure clip.rnrnDevo say it has met all my expectations and we can really load a lot of things that do not presents no cedimento.rnrnForse, could almost Starsi an external pocket with zipper at the top, right for the three essentials, mobile wallet and chiavi.rnrnTutto all a great backpack that will not change for the next 5 or 10 anni.rnrnSe happen to find it with price is best to take it right away, even if he is there to spend ourselves a few dozen euro more, basically it is to carry your own equipment that is worth a lot more money. sent on April 18, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: light, focal length adequate for such a zoom, brightness, rounded diaphragm blades Cons: AF slow and inaccurate and noisy on d7000 at night is unmanageable, F / B focus partially solved in the menu to morbiso TA improves by f / 4, vignetting marked with filters, you have to take it a step or two larger ring adapter, at least 77 mm to mount an A + CPL and not to vignettare to 17 mm. Opinion: acuistato smooth version made in japan, 250 euro used, because I wanted a wide angle range of mano.rnall'inizio on d90 I was happy, it is a car that has a good autofocus.rnora I do not know if it's the d7000 or the problem of 'goal, but I did a test with cookies lined up and one in the middle of the row scoscato, focheggiando f / 4 of that cookie I often put in the fire before or at the most a focus back towards what dopo.rnrnse not You claim to highest precision there is also, but to do portraits or still life would not recommend it, it's too inaccurate, I have always rifocheggiare between a picture and the other on a tripod, for example. and I often mistaken as just totally detto.rnrndi pro, there is an f / 2.8 is already in disframma 4 improves a figure, especially in sharpness, a blade for charity ... rnil bokeh does not convince me, I who am accustomed to the blurred focal fisse.rnrndai 35 mm up lose quality. perhaps, in hindsight, those rispermierei 250 and I would add the necessary pertrovare a sigma 18-35 or nikon 17-55.rnrnnget caught on fashion, not worth it! sent on September 25, 2014 |
 | Nikon Coolpix S2500 Pros: few, perhaps for a beginner, but no Cons: stabilization ineffective mess focus very slow and very inaccurate, unclear images and faded, very thin, almost a must for a cavallettino autoscatti.rni menu are too limited, very little to choose the settings, just those two or three basic. Opinion: what about ... a small flop Nikon.rnrnpresi this fotocamerina from less than 100 euro for when I go around a mountain bike.rnla abandoned after 2 outputs as it takes to take a life, and the colors and the focus is inesistente.rnrnnon you can choose many settings, and at night before you make the cellulare.rnrna me it seems as if an investment firm Marched forth some money and were not sure what to do and han "stitched" together and the good macchinetta.rnrnsconsigliatissimo this, coming from a compact canon a580 ( powered by AA batteries) I think I will try to sell it and look for a canon.rnrnpeccato, because of semipro SLR nikon are beautiful gems. sent on July 26, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: effective stabilization, judge focus maf, focal range, good construction, lightness and versatility, bokeh soft as pillows. Cons: low brightness, price esageratissimo, and (personal opinion) lack of function macros. Opinion: personally I find it a lens useless, as it comes with an excellent stabilization, but a very low brightness, which forces you to go up to iso or time or aperture. and therefore the dop, sends is: what is a very good (not great by) stabilization if I should still use more time in the majority of cases? where is the advantage? rnrninutile even for beginners, as it is impossible to manage themselves with diaphragms, and the depth of campo.rnprovata of d90, I was not convinced at all, useless even for portraits between 50 and 85 mm, as c 'is in need of much more diaphragms aperti.rnrnpersonalmente not recommend it, and at a lower price is a good zoom tamron 17-50 vc 2.8 fixed, and maybe we will run away with the amount requested for the 16-85 well as a macro nikon 105 mm ( D of course, and used). rne indeed, it seems to me just a gimmick entirely commercial, and not of a company that makes equipment more than 60 years of optical qualità.rnrnpoi in my opinion (but according to ME) would not hurt the function macro, something likethe sigma 17-70. but I guess the price would've risen further exaggerated by at least 200 caffè.rnrnsconsigliatissimo. is better understood as "the most useful and usable." sent on April 22, 2013 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro Pros: handling, stabilizer, cost is not excessive, good sharpness macro good, more than anything else to focus ravvicinatissimo with 70 mm focal useful block of 17 mm for transport. nice bokeh. not flare fastidioso.rn Cons: vignetting at 17 mm especially if fitted with a uv and a sky, or a uv and a c-pl, even if the brightness is not constant from the top, perhaps there was also constant, motor not very fast, sometimes difficulty in emssa focus diameter filter costs high enough to cause the filters. Opinion: I own this lens bought on ebay at about 410 euro, mounted on nikon d90.rnrnper be a handyman standard I would say that I find the best compromise between quality and price for its catoegorie and focali.rnla range of brightness is good, so far has run behaved well, and I've taken most of my foto.rnil included petal-type hood is very useful and as many targets makes its lavoretto.rnun a little flaw that makes vignetting at 17 mm, and when you want to do something close to wide can be seen, mainly in direct sunlight, or outdoors. rnlo'm good for portraits, 50 mm you make good shots of all rispetto.rnrnpiacevole bokeh. fastidioso.rnqualche not flare in the night time and with little effort the light focus, but sometimes, and it also does a nikon 16-85 vr I tried to confronto.rnil made of the macro is a good thing, but if you pictures of insects is a better focal longest why you should get close to 5 cm type with 70mm focal to make "important" in the subject foto.rnlo stabilizer does its job withefficacia.rnrnah another small flaw is the diameter of the filters that are already 72 mm, and then the price goes up, but even I to avoid vignetting of the c-pl mounted sull'uv I took adapter ring setp-up from 72 to 77 and take the filters more "important" double your sliding the c-pl and ND to 77, leaving the UV 72 mm, but it is a purchase that I have yet to fare.rnutilissimo block to 17 mm focal length for transportation. and I have no ntato moivmento unexpected focal pointing up or basso.rnrnconsiglio this lens for easy handling, portability and variety of utilizzo.rnrnin compared to the 16-85 vr nikon I find a good rival, but more for the brightness for stabilization, the Nikon is better equipped but of course a matter of taste then ... sent on January 21, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
