RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Maumll88
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maumll88



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Maumll88


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

fujifilm_16-55_f2-8wrFujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR

Pros: Robust, sharp lens, perfect to hold attached to the machine as an all-rounder

Cons: Some specimens have problems with the diaphragm ring... read below

Opinion: Perfect lens to keep in the car, 2.8 sharp, not too bulky and gives a nice feeling of robustness. With this and a fixed 1.4 you can already safely cope with most situations. So far with regard to photos of events, weddings, portraits, family photos etc. I have not felt the need for a longer focal length. The only negative note that no one in the Italian forums says is that some specimens (perhaps especially in the second-hand market) have problems with the diaphragm ring at 2.8. Let me explain. Passing from any diaphragm to 2.8 the ring has a very light play that makes the apertures change the apertures totally at random. So it can happen that during a service in which you have to switch quickly for example from f4 to f2.8 you must necessarily be sure that the camera is shooting at 2.8 because a very light micro displacement of the ring is enough to have the apertures busted. A known and very reported problem in English language in various forums. It happened to me both with a specimen of the 16-55 and with a 50-140.

sent on April 19, 2023




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me