|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Wittgenstein www.juzaphoto.com/p/Wittgenstein  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Ricoh GR III Pros: compactness, APSC sensor, jpeg, film simulations, in-camera editing, aesthetics, macro Cons: high ISO Opinion: I start by saying that I had a love/hate relationship with this little girl. Enthusiastic at the beginning, then less and sold, but in the end she returned home because she is unique in her kind and never leaves me today. Looking a bit at the photos I have taken in these years of transition to digital and return to photography, the images on average that I prefer were taken with this little one, also for the simple reason that she was (is) always with me. In some special shooting circumstances I also had difficulty understanding if the photo was taken with Ricoh or Leica Q2... I repeat in some special cases. That said, I find that it is difficult in low light when you have to make a portrait the AF does not always respond promptly and with the same ISO they seem noisier than Fuji (with the same aperture and times), around 3200 ... usable up to 1600. But if you shoot in B / W they are also excellent at 3200. For the rest super intuitive and flexible depending on how and what one photographs, in short, it is a machine that is sewn on the photographer. sent on October 04, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-E4 Pros: size, weight, keys Cons: size, viewfinder, maybe build quality Opinion: I've had this little thing for a week, and I'm a little confused. You'll tell me, well you see you put the size in both the pros and cons. That is one of the reasons for my confusion. If on the one hand it is an extremely portable machine, without objective of any kind it is little larger than a Ricoh GR III, on the other hand as soon as you add a lens begins, for my hands at least, to make the grip difficult. I'm talking about targetss like the xf16 f/2.8 or the 35 f/1.4 voigtlander with adapter. You'll tell me, but there's also the set with the extra handle. Very true, but if one buys a small car it is also because he wants portable dimensions, if I have to add accessories then I take other models. The other against is the viewfinder, in my opinion not much. They could have done better by already having the great viewfinder on the x100v. The build quality I found it "cheap", nothing to do with the X100V, x-pro (even the two to say) or the xt3-4... But for EUR 900 I certainly do not expect this construction, which is done, among other things, in Indonesia and not in Japan. I am not saying that EUR 900 is a few, but compared to machines that cost twice as much as the x-pro3, it is clear that the construction quality is lower. The rest, the one inside, all the electronics and software is the same more or less the same as the latest born in fuji house, so great file quality. Do I recommend it? I don't know. Maybe just paired with 27mm... then with 1100 euros you have a good solution of weight and size... a great introduction to the fuji world and decent portability. Otherwise if it is to enter the fuji world, without thinking about the size, I recommend the xt3 (which today can be found on offer at little more than the price of the xe4), at the same size maybe the xt30... If it is a complement, I do not recommend it, because you take off a couple of touches, the others without L and thumb rest you can not bring them and the machine still becomes bulky Finally if one already owns the xe-3, if you hold it tight. PS needless to say that back to the store my sent on March 12, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
