Reviews written by Luigi Primiceri

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Luigi Primiceri
www.juzaphoto.com/p/LuigiPrimiceri

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Luigi Primiceri

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Hoya HD Circular Polarizer

Pros: build quality, exposure times little longer.

Cons: turning the dial changes the hue of light.

Opinion: It would be a great polarizing filter if it would change the tone of colors according to the rotation of the ring. Essentially turning the ring to another smoothly and fluently, in addition to seeing the reflections disappear, changes as the colors that go from cool shades with skies so blue that it seems almost unreal as they are saturated in warm colors like we were almost at sunset at midday. I thing I find annoying, I happened to photograph a church in Paris with angles slightly divarse and meet up with the stone tending to CELESTINE in a photo and the other yellow. Nothing that can not be corrected in post production but it's still a hassle. I do not know if it's my that's bad because I did not hear anyone else complain of this problem. I also have a Hoya HD not smaller instead works perfectly. Bearing in mind that the diameter 77 HD costs much more than the PRO, not consiglio.rnrnPS: look at my photo of the Dolomites, the sky is cobalt blue without touching thesaturation, for the rocks instead I had NCREASE a lot 'saturation of orange for them as they were.

sent on October 03, 2015

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Pros: weight, low distortion, even at the edges.

Cons: sharpness, lack of feeling of solidity, price.

Opinion: I got this lens after making the sigma 10-20 f4 due to an optical defect that caused me a sharp fitful, basically I had 80% sharper and the rest blurred. Problem that could be observed only in case of an image with everything in focus. In comparison with the sigma, flying over the defect that I hope does not have all the canon is much lighter, but it also gives a feeling of lack of strength, distorts much less, the autofocus is much faster but the sharpness is disappointing, even comparable with sigma. I honestly do not understand how others have been able to put the sharpness of this objective between the pro and I find that it is the only real disappointment.

sent on January 29, 2013