|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
AlexandrosQuartarone www.juzaphoto.com/p/AlexandrosQuartarone  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM S Pros: The excellent image quality, especially in the center of the frame, the arrangement of the buttons, the possibilities of customization, the excellent speed of autofocus, the construction quality in general, with particular praise about tropicalization. Cons: Not so much the weight, which is not so much deadly, and of which in any case it is necessary to make a reason, but the very shifted distribution of the same. Opinion: An excellent lens, able to return images of great quality, precision, and graphic fidelity; close to the levels of those obtainable with a primary lens (which, of course, is, first and among other things, much brighter!), especially in the center of the negative. When extended to 600mm, the loss of acuteness, at an aperture of f/6.3, is almost negligible compared to that of a twin photo taken at f/8... Although, the diaphrammare at f/8, will certainly earn a little, something that, perhaps, a little contrast mask will never be able to outline from scratch (some micro-feathers, some textural detail, of the fine fluff ...). In any case, a choice must be made, during use at the maximum focal extension. A little more bokeh, or a little more detail? In short: Sigma Sport is a lens that is doing really well, that constitutes my telezoom of choice, and whose weight, however unbalanced, personally, I do not consider to be excessive even to carry out stray photographic hunting activities. As well as able to rival, in terms of sharpness, also with the Sigma 500mm f/4. The Tamron, on the other hand, its eternal rival and punctual creator of so many of our dilemmas is, in turn, an excellent goal, certainly better suited to meet the needs of all, far lighter and more manageable, but which, in any case, when extended to 600mm and maintained at f/6.3, turns out to be really soft ... Even on a more global analysis, Sigma is able to create images considerably better than those of tamron, my old man, and for years untraceable, slow of ordinance. sent on May 06, 2020 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P1000 Pros: The focal length; only real pro, but it is worth gold. Cons: Bad autofocus, irremediable noise even at LOW ISO, great slow buffer, flatness of images, slow zooming, very narrow bokeh possibilities. Opinion: Despite the many cons, I still find it an admirable machine, especially for birdwatchers. At ISO reasonably low, it also returns images of a quality more than discreet. In two words better (but VERY better!), and for mathematical reasons, a P1000 used with criterion, rather than a D850 (divine machine, be clear, and that in turn I use) with ISO constantly at one million and in priority of the times; especially if it demeans to the sound of crop... sent on March 10, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
