|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Valekhr www.juzaphoto.com/p/Valekhr  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 Pros: Construction, compact size, overall quality Cons: MF bezel, no correction profile for Lightroom Opinion: I was lucky enough to find it on Amazon at 480 new, during a period of discounts. After 5 months I can be satisfied, the quality is so much. I used it a few times for landscaping and a lot for night with the Milky Way. The chromatic aberrations are there, but manageable: in comparison with the sammy 24mm f1.4 and 12mm f2 it is easier to correct them. The thing that amazed me is the focus: for me it is the first lens with fully electronic af. Accustomed to canons and sammy mf, it seemed uncomfortable not to have a ring that would adjust the focus physically. Here, in fact, everything takes place through an engine electronically controlled by the ring, and focusing on the stars you can see how the change takes place in small steps. In fact, during the night I had to identify the precise position well, since the adjacent positions were out of focus. The compact dimensions are against any anti-condensation thermal bands: they can be put covering part of the ring and part of the hood, but you risk sending out of focus at the slightest movement. Luckily this year I always had a bit of wind and I didn't need the thermal bands. The sore point of this lens is the absence of the correction profile. I know there is for some camera bodies, but the Ef version used on Eos Rp is not included. Consequently, the correction of the vignetting must be done manually. sent on October 29, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS M50 Pros: Value for money, weight, compactness, ergonomics, all the advantages of ML not present on relfex Cons: An more ring would have been comfortable, 4k video. Opinion: As far as it is expensive and compared to other cameras in the same range I consider it a good purchase. With the Ef lens adaptor you have access to the immense second-hand market, clearly with some of them you lose the balance, but I consider it a "non-problem" since the machine is not born intended for demanding professionals. The weight of the body alone is comparable to two smartphones, really light. Being very small it has the advantage of taking up little space in the backpack or bag. Now let's talk about ergonomics: I read everyone who makes a flaw out of it, but I have the impression that they have never tried other cameras with similar characteristics. I personally tried them all in a store and some of which I don't name literally slipped into my hand. With the m50 in my opinion you have the maximum with the same price and characteristics. If you have big hands you should consider buying a reflex or a larger mirrorless: if I were a man 2 meters tall, I wouldn't go and buy the fiat 500, but a bigger car, instead what I see are people 2 meters tall complaining about the fiat 500 which is too uncomfortable. I do not dwell on the other features such as af, focus peaking, customization of the evf, use of the screen as joystick, customization of the keys and all the news brought by ML in general. The crop of the 4k I consider it a big limit, if you want to take yourself back to make a vlog you necessarily need a wide angle a little pushed. Finally, I find key customization more flexible on this entry level than on R-series FF. Certain functions I had assigned to directional keys are not available in R-series that cost three times as much. This is a camera for those who do not want to give up interchangeable lenses, but want to have a quality not reachable from a smartphone and travel light. It's probably one of the best cameras for those who start with photography and don't want to spend a fortune. sent on March 29, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
