|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Flavio84 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Flavio84  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: Ergonomics, burst, af fast and accurate, cleaning of raw, double slot and tropical conditions, the viewfinder, battery life. Cons: Monitor, 10 megapixel, shutter noise. Opinion: In use for several years and I can not fault it, the machine grasps like a dream, and all keys are at your fingertips, the flurry of 10fps is very useful in the action scenes. The af is fast and precise when you have hardly snaps shots out of focus (if set correctly) Raw rnI pulling out are already ready to use, just a few tweaks and forth. Up to 1600 ISO will have excellent file, rising noise is heard but if you properly usabilissimi are also exposes the 3200 ISO, the battery lasts an eternity I never bought the spare. rnIl monitor has little resolution, and there is little, all the shots seem blurry but then the surprise at home, all in perfect focus. The shutter sound is a pleasure for the ears, but it is unwelcome by some birds that manage to feel even finely tuned sound that is not so silent. I think the only real flaw of this machine are the 10 mpx, because being born for sports and wildlife often we found herselfAA to crop, if he would perfetta.rnOggi 15-16 mpx is at very low prices, and makes it the best buy a real pro at the price of an entry level APSC ..... sent on February 25, 2017 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Pros: Bright, sharp little distortion, stabilizer. Cons: Plasticky, aberrazzioni, af improved and dust infiltrates easily. Opinion: I own this lens for almost a year, I got it to replace the standard 18/55 kits, say that his strength and 'f 2.8 which makes it invaluable for those who practice street and night photos and needs the brightness and versatility 'of this zoom but can not afford the extortionate equivalent of canon, the stabilizer and' a very effective real salvascatto in low-light conditions even if I use it very rarely, but in the few times I 'was very useful, the af find it good enough and fast enough, very sharp from f4 already I use it mostly on landscape and do not go beyond the f11 because I noticed a bit of diffraction dopo.rnLe chromatic aberrations are apparent but with a couple of clicks go away, the thing that most do not like 'that sneaks easily into the dust must be there very careful though does not affect the functioning and quality' image, in the event of a sale may lead problemi.rnBuona lens, I highly recommend the excellent value 'price a full 8. sent on April 05, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
