|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bisiu92 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bisiu92 ![]() |
![]() | Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Pros: inexpensive, sturdy, well-built, autofocus quickly and accurately Cons: constructive problem of flex of diaphragm, after some wear and should be replaced Opinion: I used quest'attica combined with my 50D, I started to take this view ... in fact with subjects mainly sport ... that means to me is certainly worth the expense, of course is a bit 'dark as all 4-5.6 but remains capable of producing quality shots with an average-good PP next .... autofocus L series, then in fact no longer have produced the optics "kit" with the technology Ring-Usm (Vero) typical of the series professionalirnsostituito only for an offer with the Canon 17-40 F4 that for the present time I'm not quite exalted in comparison .... rnrnunica big minus, for more solvable with a little 'of the manual, is to replace the flex cable that controls the diaphragm ... after a while 'it is intended to break for a congenital problem of construction; all of course in relation to the use and in particular to the number of zoommaternsu internet there are numerous videos that explain step by step the replacement by farerngiusto to give an estimate of the cost of the part (diaphragm + flex cable alreadywelded) is around 20 euro shipped from china sent on November 16, 2015 |
![]() | Canon 350D Pros: ridiculous cost, easy to use, value for money I would say almost unbeatable, lightweight Cons: old technology now, AF not great, few megapixels Opinion: I have the 350d for 2 years, I bought it used and it was my first SLR ever! rnpoco to say is fantastic to start allows you to understand the basics of photography and experience the most ... sure it's old but the value for money I think it's still unbeatable (after almost 8 years since) rnc'è think that once things were done much better .... rnpenso that shots below are a clear testimony of the potential sent on January 26, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me