|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
FabioBertiph www.juzaphoto.com/p/FabioBertiph  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D850 Pros: resolution, level of detail, machine body construction, autofocus, viewfinder, image quality, silent shot, focus stacking, xqd-sd versatility, speed the right, battery life, responsive touch lcd screen. Cons: Challenging machine, not suitable for beginners, needs expert hands to exploit the potential, makes the most with adequate lenses, need powerful and recent computers for workflow, need fast cards for the transfer of giga Opinion: Taken in 2017 and after 2 years I can only talk about it extravagantly. Unfortunately I did not overuse it because for less "noble" works I preferred the d500. It is a fabulous machine, if not the best nikon ever produced, it is one of the best. The cons that someone can point out as the 9fps, the sd slot and the like do not consider them against, but only a detail since this body was born for photos at BIG resolutions, therefore not for sports photos that you need to seize the moment. This is mainly suitable for static subjects such as in the studio in still life or fashion or in low light conditions thanks to its autofocus. Yes, there was a basketball player in the commercial, but it's not where he excels. in that a d500 is best suited. The absence of the flash makes the body even more tropicalized and for the CLS system that you lose you recover it with a couple of triggers. Perhaps the only downside of the d850 is the fact that they serve fast and powerful cards and computers because at the highest resolution of raw files , jpeg fills the memory that is a marvel and could laggar and slow the work of postproduction. I recommend that you set the raw in M or S mode in case of web photos. For the rest, however, nothing to report negatively. Even with a 35mm or a 50mm 1.8 makes supernitid and detailed photos. As soon as you take it in your hand you feel solidity and robustness, a PRO body in short. It is still a bit expensive for many people and in fact it is addressed to professional clientele or the amateur who wants to take off a vacancy, but if used for their own work does not disappoint. Personally I took pictures to print advertising posters and you could see the details all over the frame. thing that with my old d7100 although at 24mpx I would never have reached... and I dreamed of it with the D3. In short, it is a machine that is worth all the money spent if used properly and with the right lenses. In addition to that you need to learn all the 1000 functions it has to make it give your best, but once you learn you will not leave it anymore. It's an almost perfect machine. Almost because it doesn't have the speed of a d5 and doesn't hold the noise like the d780, but this one was born for other purposes Things that with d5 and d780 you could not get or better, you will get it but not like this d850 sent on May 15, 2020 |
 | Nikon Coolpix AW100 Pros: Toughness, versatility, image quality for the year it was released, detailed gps, speed and convenience in use Cons: autonomy a little poor, different noise already at 1600 iso, a little dark starts from 3.9, unreliable waterproofness on some models, price to the new, has no psam Opinion: I have been owning this car since summer 2012 as I wanted to have a camera always with me not to use that of the mobile phone, but without having the fear that it could fall, take water or that it was in contact with sand, wind dust etc... when I saw that Nikon had launched a new line of sturdy waterproof compacts and that I didn't even have to worry about the bumps then I took it. His job does it. Take a point and shoot, quick and fast. It's the classic from the tip and snaps without thinking much. In the end it was born for this, keep memories and commemorate moments difficult to get with a challenging machine like a reflex because impossible to carry anywhere. Taken to the sea, to the pool, to the beach with 35grades or even to the mountains at -10 -12, the car has always done its duty, it has never failed. Of course the image quality is not that of the reflex and now in 2020 it is dated, but when you call it into question, it is ready. The gps works well, automatically locates the location for each photo made, if it is activated the works. The path is a bit vague, in the sense it is not overdetailed and the road traveled by the gps is approximate, in short it is not to be relied on if you get lost to find the house :) A sore note is the battery. Being small as a machine, although sturdy, they could not make a very capacitive battery and returns about 250 photos, a little few if you are out for a half day especially in an exclusive place where difficult is to come back and difficult to carry with you a reflex. For the rest I gave 8 grade because it's the kind of compact that you put in your pocket and you forget you have it because you don't care that much. I didn't even put display protection on her because that would be counterintuitive. To have such a sturdy machine was born precisely to always be in the hands of the photographer and that you pull out regardless of the weather that is outside, have a display protection... seems useless. A brighter otiect, a more effective noise reduction and a more capacitive battery would have made a machine almost perfect... but that would have been a high price... and at about 250 dollars we say it was at the limit. sent on April 29, 2020 |
 | Nikon D780 Pros: ultra-fast and precise live-view aufotocus, compact and solid body, comfortable grip, high range, double slot with fast uhs-2 card compatibility, high iso hold, even more effective 3D tracking, effective Eye-Detection AF Cons: no battery grip (at least so far as January 2020), flash pop up absent, so no cls, absence Ir, remote remote remote control incompatibility ML-L3, Autofocus 51 points and no module af d5/d500/d850, initial cost high even only Nital body (over 2000 cocuzze) Opinion: I made a D750 overrated, because practically new, I already had one before this and I took the D780 . I tested them together and the difference in file quality that is the thing that interests me the most, there is and you also notice high iso over 125000 Iso for example, for me that I shoot a lot at night. The AF is more precise and quick in the crosshairs than the D750. live view is a different story and there's nothing to compare. The Expeed6 is faster than a card. (uhs-2 vs. uhs-1 of the D750, i.e. a fast board in SCRITTURA up to 300mb/s against the maximum 100 mb/s of the uhs-1) there is no Battery Grip but the handle is more comfortable and the little finger does not run away from me, also because I have small hands. More defined monitor, touch even more sensitive than that of D500 and D850. Best sensitivity of the d850 because it obviously has fewer megapixels. In short, for what I have to do, I also thought to have a clone of the D750 with only a better live view, but trying it on the field both I repeat, I saw a NET difference (5 years are many) The D750 is mid-2014 the D780 early 2020. So since I could afford it, was it worth changing? If it is in these conditions you. It looks like the D750, but instead there are sharp differences. Maybe it's a bit early to do a full review since I haven't used it yet and squeezed it properly, but the first impressions are very good. The price is high is true, but even the D750 cost about 2000 euros. I would recommend for those who have budget problems to wait for price drops especially Nital. Mine was more of a challenge since having a new D750 with the fresh D780, didn't make sense to me. sent on January 24, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF DX 10.5mm f/2.8 G ED Fisheye Pros: Sharpness, compactness, lightness, if found used well, quality value, small but powerful Cons: Price taken nital and new, lens cover that tends to widen and get lost, chromatic aberration correctable in post, af not ultrasonic, but mechanical. Opinion: I took this lens way back in 2012 from a private who had finished hobbies as a father. It is a lens that is not used every day, such as a 24-70 or on a dx an 18-105/16-85, so the used found was really little used. Although it is not always attached to the machine body, I always have it behind it as it is light and small, but it churns out images already from a simple d90, very particular. For one who does photogafia of events shows festival concerts etc... is the best. No lens can give that effect. Not even supergrandangers. Being 2.8 is useful in night events. The focus is not lightning, but with a wide-angle is not a problem nor for the fact that it is silent, since in my case, the events are much noisier. One flaw I can see is that the forward lens is at risk and the built-in lampshade does not defend much, even if fortunately nothing has ever happened. Some chromatic aberration that can be corrected in post. Summing up: small optics, but powerful. Not every day, but when he is called in, he does his job very well, he gives excellent results even on non-recent machines. an eye on the front cap that could get lost widening and the lens without protective filters is exposed despite the lampshade. As a yield, excellent sharpness albeit with a bit of aberration especially at 2.8. If found used it is a well-made and smart expense (from 350 to 500). New is no longer worth especially nital (almost 900 euros). sent on December 17, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: Compactness, double slot very useful, U1 U2 very comfortable, file quality with mid-to-high-end lenses, sensitivity for an aps.c Cons: light underexposure when used with flash compared to the younger sister d7000, higher battery consumption than the little sister, high release price (over 1200) even if it is now about 400 Opinion: Taken as a backup body after 3 years from the D7000 and due to a long repair, I used as the primary body this body. THE difference with the D7000 you see, the quality is improved as files, the 24mpx you see. I noticed a slight underexposure with flashes in TTL-BL mode which forced me to raise the iso and although newer, it generated noise that then was removed in post, but with the D7000 I also saw a different light. After 6 years now, I still own it as "last" body with few shots taken in recent months. Good Machine but I wasn't as excited as the D7000 Vote 7 sent on December 07, 2019 |
 | Nikon D500 Pros: Handling, Robustness, File Quality, Autofocus Speed, Iso Sensitivity, Compactness Cons: hard to find anything against Opinion: Pretty much a monster for what's been thought. Really fast and reliable. I went from a D7100 to a D500 and although only 3 years old, the differences are monstrously visible. Quick, flawless autofocus, when paired with quality lenses, churns out professional photos. Although a D850 and a D3S are taken, which, however old it is, remains a flagship, the D500 is one of the very first machines I use in various situations. With several bodies available, it remains the first or maximum second choice for what I have to do. Super with telephoto lenses or supertele, with the Crop factor. Sensitivity is high. Photos with the D7100 I used about 2500 Iso, with the D500 arriving just at 640. I took pictures of 8000 and 10000 Iso and for an aps-c it's a lot of stuff and the material obtained is quietly workable in post. It's hard to find fault in my opinion. Maybe the price at the time of release Nital (about 2000) but after almost 4 years since its release is about 1500-1600, not nital even to 1300 and used on 900-1000. Very robust even though the display seemed fragile. Also being an aps-c the body is slightly smaller and lighter. After taking the D5 I found very similar files and I can declare it therefore a D5 in "miniature", 10 fps, fast processor, with XQD the buffer holds a lot, the Autofocus very fast covers the whole frame, which helps a lot. In sports and stock photos it is among the best if not the best excluding the D5. What to say. Money well spent. Having d5 d850 and d3s, it often turns out the VERY choice as I said, in fact in proportion to the time had, the d500 is second only to the D3S as use sent on December 07, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7000 Pros: Reliability, ease of use, lightweight, comfortable ergonomics, double slot, robust as it is an aps-c Cons: now dated in 2019, noise over 1250 perceptible iso, AF not always lightning and precise Opinion: My first Semipro at the beginning of the new 2010: arrived from a d3100, the difference was clear. Very comfortable, robust even if a semi-professional and classified as consumer. Used quite a lot, the first model 145 thousand shots, replaced shutter because it fell from 2 meters and then another 220k shots. He accompanied me for 7 long years and then died permanently with spare parts not available. Everywhere I went, it captured what I had to do. Of course, it doesn't compare with newer, more massive machines, but in my opinion it was the perfect heir to the old D90. One of the best aps-c reflexes from which came the following 7100 7200. The double slot is very comfortable, the first model to have one. 6 fps enough, iso up to 1250 used, because beyond the noise was clearly visible. One that for what I had to do was fine, clearly equipped with flash, but after 1 and a half years with the d3100, the D7000 took a huge step compared to the entry level. For my gaudio I wanted to take a second body, because after 200k shots I knew it would abandon me... what happened, but I "betrayed" it with the d7100 that I still have but did not satisfy me like the D7000. I mean, I'd say a nice 9. sent on December 06, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
