|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lucacoli www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lucacoli  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x Pros: Price (new paid the equivalent of 134 euro to hong kong), exif data, lightness, performance of fixed lenses exceptional, personally I have not found any limitations on the use of diaphragms lens except the obvious loss of two stops of light. Cons: With zoom lenses AF becomes difficult light conditions difficult, not weather sealed Opinion: Tested on the Canon 70-200L f4, 100-400L, 50 f1, 8, 100L macro and I carried out all tests in the studio on APSC sensor (Canon 60D). Result 100-400 of staff is preferable to crop the file with objective smooth as it keeps more details. With the multiplier is much softer than it already is. The 70-200 I have not found notable differences on fixed while I find it just brilliant, if used to amplify a 40% macro capability helps capture a greater amount of detail and the 50ino 1.8 seems to give him even sharper turning it into a 70mm f2, 5.rnFunziona even in cascade with the extension tubes. From HAVE! RnConsigliatissimo on fixed and very very helpful with macro.rn sent on March 21, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Pros: compact zoom pump limiter af value in used Cons: Stabilizer is not the latest generation, lack of sealing, a bit dated Opinion: I bought it to replace the newer, lighter and less expensive Tamron SP 70-300 f/4-5.6 af vc usd for the sole purpose of having those 100 mm more often that I missed and hoping to improve the quality of my glass. Definition of maniac I run my own tests immediately tripod comparing the 100-400 with tamron. Between 100 and 200 mm are indistinguishable both at f/4.5 that f / 8 and would not be able to recognize the photos if not conditioned by the reading of the data. From 200 to 300 at room temperature the canon has a good advantage that increases with focal length while closing af/7.1-8, where the canon pulls out his best, the difference becomes significant. I tested it with extension tubes to improvise a macro 200 mm and is not too bad and definitely sharper the tamron in this field and the zoom lock is useful. The stabilizer is very dated and the autofocus is not as if lightning is not active limiter focal accustomed to tammy the degresso feels. To convince me to keep it and then make my zoom preferito were the size, the weight is not too much that you can use for hours, the fabulous zoom pump (Fluent in chases), good image quality between 200 and 300 mm and a decent quality from 300 up . It is paraganobile to landlines, but you will get better images than any 70-200 multiplied in price and size inferiori.rnE 'excellent lens and is under 1000 euro in used. Recommended for those who do not want to multiply less bold canvases and who does not like to change lens or get away with 2 bodies macchina.rn sent on February 14, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
