|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nolan www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nolan  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF (1987 version) Pros: blurred, materials, fire ring, price. Cons: Slow and ruomoroso AF Opinion: Purchased a year ago for personal monkey and because 'too curious to see it at work on a Nikon D3, obviously used but in conditions really equal to new. It is not a "sharp" lens but it still has a very good sharpness and a very soft and very pleasant blur. The "pump" system of this lens is really very practical to use, the fire ring (which is the same as the zoom) is among the best that I personally have ever tried, impeccable materials and construction, from true pro. It is one of those lenses that personally make me appreciate even more doing photography, both for a sense of robustness and for first-level optical quality, in use in my way of seeing it makes everything more interesting and puts you in direct contact with photography the most real and male, from elbow grease in short. I use it practically only in manual and freehand, so the fact that there is no bracket of the knight or that it does not have a lightning AF does not weigh me down (For that I have more). It should be judged in my opinion according to your needs, and it is to be taken into account that a lens of other times, for me that first of all I am a photography enthusiast is a fabulous lens that I will certainly never sell, for the laser beams of star trek instead there is so much other type (70-200 f2.8 vrii) definitely two different worlds at completely different prices. sent on March 16, 2023 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
