|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianlucailmoro www.juzaphoto.com/p/Gianlucailmoro ![]() |
![]() | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Planar T* 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Pro construction, contrast, b/w grayscale, manual focus Cons: Front cap that has nothing to do with the rest of the lens, if the brand wasn't written I would say it would be a fake adaptation Opinion: What can I say, I chased it for years, I wanted a manual focus to rediscover the taste of the shot thought, replaced by the Canon 50 f1.4 has no comparison, two different worlds, both for build quality and for the images that this lens churns out. It gives satisfaction, even headaches when you miss the moment, but it was not born for this, you know. To be used on FF, it gives emotions. sent on February 15, 2025 |
![]() | Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Pros: Quality, colors, very fast af, used price, 77 Cons: If I really have to find a "flaw" I would say F4.0 but you know and that's okay. Opinion: I bought this beautiful used lens in the store for less than 600 euros, after the very kind salesman made me try it for a few shots, I was undecided between this and the Sigma 12-24 f2.8, but I had no doubts, I immediately found a feeling difficult to explain, it is one of those lenses that you mount in the camera and you would never take off. Excellent on aps-c, superlative on FF, does what it has to and does it well, sent on February 15, 2025 |
![]() | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: Build quality, great colors Cons: Autofocus not very ready, not for marcro, for that the manual is a must Opinion: I have had this fantastic lens for a long time that I also use for portrait, at f2.8 very sharp in the center, fantastic from f4.0 onwards. On FF it has an extra gear, even if I have used it for years on aps-c and I preferred the 160mm for insect macros because it is less intrusive. Highly recommended, in my opinion it is and remains among the best lenses churned out by Canon mom. sent on February 15, 2025 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me