|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Robynikon www.juzaphoto.com/p/Robynikon  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Compact construction with good plastics, sharpness. Cons: Inaccurate autofocus (very often) color range to the shot not adapted to reality , excessive weight associating it with the D800 becomes heavy the photo day. Opinion: The AF's repetitive difficulty many times forced to resume the shooting scene wasting time , color range not always perfect on the scenery shooting (these problems also found trying the optics on D750 and D4 ) frankly given the expense I expected qualitatively more , I had already obtained a bad experience with this brand in the past and the thing repeated in any case the solution was found : Sold! sent on August 16, 2020 |
 | Nokia Lumia 735 Pros: solid construction despite the plastic parts with good vision of the screen, battery life very good compared to other smartphones Cons: slow with different apps of common use, other specifications are virtually unusable on this platform, good audio. Opinion: is the third of the Nokia series used, frankly I expected something more 'but unfortunately the windows platform has limits compared to competitors on the market besides not being able to use some app correctly as systematically the phone was crashed, when they were usable slowness of use was such to give the use.rnNonso the operator Vodafone (for several years used) I also had problems of reception due to lack of signal in the city areas and not only the use of internetrnè very slow in the opening of attachments in short I can not say to be satisfied compared to the previous Nokia 720, 925 which have surrendered after intense use.rn sent on December 22, 2017 |
 | Nokia Lumia 720 Pros: Good battery life. Good telephone reception even with little field. Cons: limit camera shooting in full light, poor shooting on shadow areas. video footage difficult.rn Opinion: massive but slippery aesthetics, it needs cover.rnTogether, the phone rating is good, sometimes mediocre (very slow), mediocre new system I have used enough on the telephony and on the internet and lately it was often shut down alone after 20 to 30 minutes it started running again, until it was permanently locked up without the operating company for reuse spare parts. sent on September 05, 2017 |
 | Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Pros: Cons: Opinion: sent on July 31, 2017 |
 | Nikon D300 Pros: Good body grip. Cons: Noise to higher ISO. Opinion: Perhaps he sold it precipitously to switch to a superior Nikon model, today I would resume it because with some weight optics the balance was perfect according to significantly lower weight models today in commerce. Good and firm the handle even for those who do not like me Small hands, in general has always given me satisfaction for sharpness and quality in the colors, confirms that still in the market are used bodies in good condition at low prices, for a reflex in any case dated. sent on July 12, 2017 |
 | Casio Exilim EX-H20G Pros: Compact, GPS presence with good function, sharpness. Cons: Nothing to declare Opinion: In order to be a compact, it is well utilized on its 14 Mega Pixels, always used as a spare wheel to Nikon bodies anywhere and has never disappointed me. The built-in GPS has a good function compared to other compact, worthwhile targets and mass Quick focus also towards moving subjects in comparison to the classic and previous compact mid range (Nikon and Canon) I have resold, here we are on a much higher level. sent on June 21, 2017 |
 | Nokia Lumia 930 Pros: Body, screen, memory Cons: High battery power for ease of use, camera not always up, over-heating almost constant body. Opinion: Bought, but the disappointment is for limited battery life (normal and unsustainable use of the internet, chat, outgoing / incoming calls) the camera was not always reliable, especially on shadow and sharpness areas, after about I resold it for 2 months, fed up with almost always having to discharge. sent on May 29, 2017 |
 | Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM Pros: a valid robust and reliable goal Cons: always in ambush flare but with a little care you can manage the problem. Opinion: I like the wide 12-mm visual recovery that has a goal all in all good quality at a fair price with good color rendering, the weight is felt with a body lightweight SLR, become well-balanced when used with the D800 or D3 rnsicuramente is commendable on the landscapes where for the best. sent on October 18, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.4 G ED Pros: Bright, optical prestige, very good yield Cons: definitely the weight and a fairly high cost. Opinion: I got to try (borrow) though I do not love the fixed lenses must say I rimastornsoddisfatto for its sharpness and brightness at certain shots is essential to have, the quality of this light is indisputable sicuramente.rnSe you are not prepared to the optical weight in a full day could become a problem. sent on October 18, 2016 |
 | Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Pros: Improved external aesthetic materials, a good focus even if not extremely fast, handy if you want to bring along different optical focal differente.È 'a perspective that keeps its price on the market of' used if you plan to sell. Cons: Autofocus slow and sometimes inaccurate, not very bright, the longest focal length will denote light games on joints that long can cause problems to 'telescope itself. Opinion: Practical as in 'groups together various focal has a cost quite affordable, I think it is suitable for those who want to embark on this wonderful hobby and then move on optical quality' superiore.Peso not excessive in 'insieme.Si can also find good deals in the market dell 'usato.rnRispetto to 18-200 classic gives you photographic performance very different. sent on June 12, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
