|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Paolo D.j. www.juzaphoto.com/p/PaoloD.j. ![]() |
![]() | Sigma SD Quattro Pros: well-built machine body,100 iso image quality,shoot raw,jpeg and dng,big buttons,simple menu,great display Cons: absolute slowness in writing,slow autofocus,bad yield over 200 iso,green flare in backlight,af continuous non-existent,annoying delay in refresh of the viewfinder,battery life,software for development raw very slow,buttons too soft and ghiere too Hard Opinion: a machine to be used only for static subjects, with low iso and cavalletto.la image quality in controlled situations is fabulous,I had 3 digital medium-formed machines with 36x48 sensor, the results are comparable to these, as long as using serious targets art, with older ones is not guaranteed the proper functioning of the autofocus.beautiful colors, and white balancing in automatic very fedele.il body machine is solid,although the design very questionable. very defined and bright rear display, alongside which there is a smaller display indicating the settings of the machine.imenu is very simple and easy to imparare.la battery life is scarsa.il the viewfinder is large with well-read characters, although although slow in refresh, also between takes it turns all black and an hourglass appears. sent on September 17, 2019 |
![]() | Hasselblad HC 80mm f/2.8 Pros: reduced weight and also to the whole compattornnitidezza aperturarnghiera focus very fluid and precisarnotturatore central Cons: af noisy Opinion: this is considered normal focal length on medioformato, I use it on a Hasselblad H3DII 31, the sharpness is very good already at full apertura.rncome all other goals and hc hcd has the central shutter, so you can synchronize the flash of all time scatto.rnin conclusion of a handyman able to give excellent results sent on August 16, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me