|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Error404 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Error_404  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 105mm f/2 D DC Pros: Strong construction ergonomics also pleasing to the touch. Cons: insufficient compared to what I expected. Opinion: One of the first goals I have used in the past with the Nikon D3, along with an AF-S 14-24mm f / 2.8 G ED. For me it was a great disappointment at the time, perhaps because I had too many expectations about that. At the same time, I also had a Canon kit (1D MK IV and 5D Mk II) with several L optics including 85 f 1.2 and 135 f 2, I expected 105 F 2 Defocus Control, wrong, something like a middle ground that would do it it looks like a potty at the yield of Canon 135 f2 L and 85 f 1.2 but I was illusing. From the very first results I immediately realized that the approach was unpredictable for both the focal length completely different from that of its intrinsic quality that I am very disappointed with. She gave me flat pictures, with no depth of volume and a blur that I could never let it go down. rnrnVisually direct comparison with more powerful optics has played an important role in forming my personal opinion on this lens, which I find unjustifiably exquisite with respect to what is in gglad to return. sent on September 17, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 1.4x III Pros: Definitely improved over the previous version. Able to maintain almost unchanged is the AF speed that the optical quality on which it is equipped. Cons: Nobody. Having previously used the version II I can not see. Opinion: 6ugrave; light of the new version that made me feel more fragile. But in fact it is not, it has nothing to envy to the previous version. rnrnHo got to try on the Canon EF 500mm f / 4 L IS II USM with the 5D SR (amazing) and with the 1D MK IV with which to my mind keeps all its peculiarities, even if the camera body and its AF module it is a bit less young, on this last camera I also used with the 200mm f / 2.8 L II USM with considerable satisfaction both yield and velocity AF (basically I have not noticed his presence) when used with optical not the latest generation mistakenly thought the quality was worse, and even here I had happily ricredermi.rnIn substance in my opinion the new teleconverter 1.4x III has made great strides in quality to the point that if the first ' use of the version II was somewhat a stopgap to not lose the picture of a distant subject provided you give up a little bit of quality; Now the quality that returns the new version 1.4x III is directly comparable to the smooth optics on which montato.rnIl price seems adequate for what it is able to return, is a totally professional tool that can easily become indispensable. sent on October 17, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
