|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Michelantonio2005 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Michelantonio2005  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Build quality, bokeh, three-dimensionality and Out of the plans that approaches the fixed hood that doubles as a bumper. Cons: Weight, dimensions especially with the lens hood, sharpness let it down in pieces not perfect. Opinion: I state that I had two copies of the 1st series f / 2.8 that I had never met and a 24-105 f / 4 that was even worse, although the latter recently built (2013). Then I switched to the new version II of 24-70 f / 2.8 that I especially enjoyed for more lightness and sharpness, but in the end I wanted to come back to the objective in question because I found a great sample used almost perfect. ^ 1 This version has a sharpness definitely lower than the new, but overall I find it more enjoyable for bokeh, three-dimensionality and Out of the plans that recalls more closely the performance of fixed. At least for my taste! In addition, the 1st model like the construction of the tank (although you pay in terms of weight) and the big hood which protects it better, also mechanically (especially at 24 mm when it is fully extended, unlike the new model in maximum extension is 70 mm). For those who want greater clarity and lightness, and less space,the new version II of the zoom would strongly regret it because no fixed with those features in the focal (a bit like the 70-200 f2.8 IS II L- except the mythical 50 and 85mm f / 1.2). For the rest I prefer the version 1 or, at least, my esemplare.rnrn rnrnrn sent on June 01, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM II Pros: Sharpness, versatility, tropicalization, weight, balance with 6D. Cons: High price for which I would have expected the IS, plastic construction, too small hood, in general "too perfect" but with little character, for my taste. Opinion: I am a bit 'Bastian Contrario and I insert my experience for those who are undecided in the choice between this and the 1st version: in fact I said that I had and sold, after having 2 copies of the first series f / 2.8 that does not they had never satisfied me and a 24-105 f / 4 that was even worse, despite being the latter of recent construction (2013). But returning to the goal in question .... in the end I sold it to return now to a sample of the first series finally OK. At the time I also compared it with the Sigma 35 f / 1.4 art and from my empirical tests and home affairs made with the 6D I detected a slight superiority of the sigma 35 art on the Canon 24-70 f2.8 II. So slight that superiority that I ended up preferring the immense versatility of the zoom without any regret, also because these objectives were very similar as rendered (sharpness, neutrality ... I would say "both perfect"). As I said, however, I also sold this last zoom to come backand the first version of 24-70 f2.8 (a very fine specimen that is rare to find) which has a definitely lower sharpness but which I find more pleasant for bokeh, three-dimensionality and detachment of the floors. At least for my taste! In addition to the old model I like the construction of a tank (but of greater weight) and the large hood that protects it even mechanically especially at 24 mm when it is in maximum extension (as opposed to the new model) .rnVolendo greater sharpness and above all the two opening stops in more today I would resume the Sigma (yes, but to find a sample without problems of f / B focus! or maybe wait for a version II of 35 L), but only because it has those different features (and complementary) at 24-70 1st version. rnA who instead prefers those features described among the pro version of the new zoom I recommend it strongly because it would not regret any fixed in those focal (a bit like the 70-200 f2.8 IS II L- except the f / 1.2). rn sent on June 01, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Sharpness, AF speed, image stabilization, excellent build quality, excellent bokeh. Cons: Weight, price, and perhaps it would be better if it was black, for extra discretion when you are around. Opinion: A purchase and weighted suffered a thousand times because of the high price taking into consideration the amateur that I do. Now that I have it I regret having waited so long. I have not tried the fixed focal lengths covered by this zoom, but even if they were better, I "settle" the photo that spring and bloom from this. I tried it and it is fabulous especially on portraits. On the street gives me a little 'discomfort can not go "unnoticed" and at first I felt wasted for my needs. Then I had the opportunity to take pictures at a friend's wedding and friends over for a new twist for the results obtained without being the official photographer enjoyed the versatility, so the idea out of my head to get me some fisso.rnL 'idea of some fixed lens instead has stayed with me the entire zoom range covered by the 24-70 f/2.8 1st version that does not give me the same satisfaction from more when I have the 70-200. For this reason, there is almost always on my 6D attacked him. Now I understand those who say that some goals are addictive. I tried it during the day with the extender 2X III to photograph and film the tricolor arrows in an event and did not notice loss of detail if not enlarging in an exaggerated way and I would say inutilmente.rnChi can and aim for the highest quality purchases it also used and will never repent. sent on July 12, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
