|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Sergio Bagna www.juzaphoto.com/p/SergioBagna  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Hoya ProND1000 Pros: Sharpness; absence of aberrations, vignette and reflections. Cons: Light dominant on yellow-green. Opinion: It commendably performs its task of lengthening the exposure time in full light to several seconds, without affecting the sharpness in the slightest and without creating reflections, artifacts and vignette. It happens that you have to slightly correct the tint in postproduction, but not always: it depends on the color of the scenario. The case is not so easy to open; on the other hand, it is stiff, quite sturdy and protects the glass well from dust. sent on March 04, 2020 |
 | Nikon AF-P 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G DX VR Pros: All. Cons: Lack of keys to insert manual focus and VR. Opinion: I also read negative reviews about this goal. Which I have to tell you: I'll be lucky, because of the three thousand shots I made him do he didn't patch up practically any. It focused lightning and very quiet, excellent contrast and color, no vignette, no chores and, more importantly, perfect detail. The material used is not plastic but a robust and light polycarbonate with which even formula one machines are manufactured. Bought in kit with the D3500, it frankly surprised me and quite a lot, positively. Only do you have a right then? No: it has no buttons, so for focus and VR you have to use the camera controls. Small annoyance that does not affect the quality of the result. Considering also the price and the weight, my vote can only be 10. sent on December 02, 2019 |
 | Nikon D3500 Pros: Image quality; weight; encumbered; dynamic range; great grip Cons: RAW + JPEG limited; multi-switch; lack of histogram during shooting; control ring; fixed screen; lack of braketing, Fn keys, microphone input, headphone output and stereo audio; video focus Opinion: sent on November 23, 2019 |
 | Nikon AF-P DX 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Pros: Image quality; cost; weight and clutter. Cons: Brightness; some chromatic but negligible aberration. Opinion: You can find on the net many tests of this goal, which say more or less the same things: excellent definition especially in the center of the image and intermediate focal points, acceptable and easily correctable distortion, negligible vignette, absence of flare on the one hand, constructive weakness on the other, especially with regard to plastic graft, and some chromatic aberration. Owning one, which I use frequently for architectural photos as well as interiors, especially churches, precise the following. 1) It is comfortable to carry around, given the negligible weight and modest size. 2) From an optical point of view it provides good results from every point of view, definition in the lead. Even at the shortest focal, to notice the slight drop in sharpness on the edges you have to enlarge quite a bit. 3) Quick and flawless focus. 4) The bayonet is not metal but polycarbonate, like Formula 1 cars, jets and the best racing bikes. Is he really going to be that weak? 5) The sore spot is the brightness. The maximum opening, ranging from f/4.5 to 10 mm to f/5.6 to 20 mm, proved insufficient in various circumstances, see interiors of churches. The possibility of having a much higher angle of view than the 18-55 mm of the kit, and therefore to increase the width of the shooting area by a lot, you pay with rather slow shooting times (but the VR helps) and/or with the increase of ISOs that certainly does not benefit the result. If with the lens of the kit you can get all the desired subject into the frame, it is preferable to use the latter, which, with its opening f/3,5-5.6, at 18 mm of focal has a couple of stop advantage and therefore provides visibly cleaner results. This applies, however, only in cases where there is little light. If the light is good, however, the results are qualitatively similar and the 10-20 mm has the gear more than the large angle of field. In conclusion: for those who do not want to spend too much it is a purchase to make without a doubt. Along with a telephoto lens and a macro lens, as well as of course the kit, effectively completes the minimum kit that every amateur photographer should have. sent on June 10, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
