|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Masti www.juzaphoto.com/p/Masti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Pros: Microcontrast, construction, brightness, AF speed, real handyman Cons: Weight, lens hood so-so, absence VR Opinion: Taken at the time of the return in Fuji coupled with T3. I have always avoided it before since I preferred the fixes or a whole make cheaper. By the time I realized that a zoom, when you're traveling or anyway when you do not know what scenes you will present in front, is priceless. Also in my opinion a whole making worthy of this name must start from 24 equivalent. In Fuji There are no alternatives except the 16-50 or 16-45 that are optical plastic kits, with good optical performance to tell the truth, but that limit you a bit for the brightness and the absence of tropicalization. The 18/55 is a 28 equivalent is not tropicalized and the AF is slower. Here's the thing that amazed me favorably is just the speed of MAF. Equal to the last fixed F2. Not to mention that put at 55 and 2.8 allows good portraits. Even in landscaping if the quarry beautifully seen the sharpness offered. Suffers only from 16 of the classic distortion of these zooms, even professional, as you should consider this 16-55, a professional lens in all respects, including constructive. Useless then complaining about that much of the weight. Negative point the absence of the stabilizer. (see case on H1, a My opinion Mio L perfect coupled in terms of use and ergonomics). sent on January 24, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
