| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
 |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.
 |
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R Pros: Quality optics, bokeh, construction, color rendering. Cons: Cap, AF. Opinion: A fixed light truly exceptional, matched the excellent X-e2. My room on the Af is a bit slow and sometimes impreciso.rnNon know what will change with the firmware that I scaricare.rnUn 35 do not buy to do sports but landscapes, portraits and street. For the latter type is the speech of AF ... easy if you try to catch a shake-shots "stolen" rnpoichè sometimes mistaken fire ... but it is equally easy to bring home beautiful portraits! sent on 29 Settembre 2015 |
 |
Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS Pros: Optical quality, price, weight, color rendering, stabilizer Cons: Hood that breaks easily, too plasticky Opinion: A great lens in relation to the price. Paid about 170 euro used has an excellent color rendering and a good stabilizer. I really like how rende.rnCapace also a decent bokeh considered the diaphragm. In reality there is only valid in relation to the price, the series "Who has satisfied ..", but it's really a great goal. I imagine that the 55-200 is a lama..ma the price goes up a lot, even nell'usato.rnrnIn many situations I find it even more powerful of 18-55.rnrn sent on 11 Aprile 2015 |
 |
Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Pros: Build quality, resistance to flare, sharpness, image quality and performance. Cons: lack of AF but is not a true against Opinion: Vote of 10/10. Great value! If I think of the cost of other lenses I find this lens even more exceptional. Great color rendering, excellent resistance to flare, clear and "sharp". RnOvvio that small defects are found but there is no lens is 250 euro perfetta.rnSi new and even below 200 euro used ... what you want? It makes no sense to spend 1000 euro for a fisheye Canon.rnQualità constructive another neo ottima.rnrnUnico, so to speak, the lack of AF and a ring to focus not so intuitive that goes relazionatarncon the dial aperture.rn sent on 26 Dicembre 2012 |
 |
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Pros: Quality / price ratio, overall performance at all focal lengths. Good bokeh and beautiful portraits. Stabilization. Cons: Given the price and the focal range I would say no. Opinion: Obviously, if you pick a lens from 400-600 euro up is no difference constructive but to have substantial upgrade in terms of image quality you have to climb quite a price. Sometimes sfocheggia, especially in low light conditions ... but it costs 200 euro, covering 200mm and you can not get a very good cut. Alternative in terms of its objectives "cheap" is the Tamron 70-300 VC 4-5.6 (than however it costs more), the rest to 200 euro there is nothing so good for Canon. The construction is kit lens but it is still valid, unless you smash it on a rock not to be broken by using it :) sent on 28 Settembre 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
