|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Musicboy www.juzaphoto.com/p/Musicboy  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T200 Pros: Reduced size and weight, versatile, excellent quality Cons: Non-high quality outer material Opinion: I've been buying the Fujifilm X-T200 for about a month now and I can safely say it's a amazing camera. I bought it for 770 euros including the XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ lens. Regarding the latter, this is the first time that a kit lens has a good quality. Even if the outer material is plastic, it will surprise you. Then it is stabilized and this can help for both photos and videos. I then immediately purchased the XF 23mm f/2 R WR and here you get to superlative quality. The latter is not stabilized. I confirm that the machine churns out beautiful JPEG and, for those like me who love non-post-produced photos, if not to correct serious things, it is the ideal camera. This Fuji also allows you to make post-production in the machine; it is put on the market as an entry level, perhaps also because of some menus similar to a mobile phone, but not so. As far as the photography department is concerned, for me it is superior to the Sony a6500. Finally, there is the video department which, honestly, I think has ample room for improvement. The image quality is there, but using the two digital stabilizers, you occasionally see micro shots. Slow motion is good, but this can also be improved. I also bought it for stabilization and, despite the criticisms just made, I prefer it to the a6500. The latter has the sensor stabilized, but honestly I have never noticed a big difference with active stabilization or not. I was looking for a camera that would take great photos and stabilize for videos, this also to avoid too many post-productions. She is the right camera, I recommend it and as a final grade I give her an 8.5/9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- November 14, 2020 In response to Jumax, i've never seen burned pixels, maybe machine or faulty lens. I use both the 15-45 and the fixed 23mm. Hello sent on July 12, 2020 |
 | Sony A6300 Pros: Almost everything Cons: Battery life, non-touch display and non-tipper for making auto video. Opinion: I purchased the 6300 with 16-50 lens at the end of July 2018. Technically it seems a good machine, but I need your feedback regarding the quality of the photo. To me they don't look nice, however having a poor notebook monitor, I would get an opinion. I seem to have read everywhere that the 6300 is a camera that puts under many SLR cameras, so I think it is the fault of the lens, although some say that you can make nice photos even with the 16-50. My next step is to buy the Sel35F18 and the SelP18105G, but before I do, I would like to remove the doubt that the camera has no problems. Below links with some photos: https://www.flickr.com/gp/164224606 @ N06/ej5855 P.S. unprocessed photos thanks Luke sent on August 28, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
