|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ermete Forloni www.juzaphoto.com/p/ErmeteForloni  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony A7r Pros: Extraordinary sensor, used price, dynamic range Cons: Now dated system, autofocus, iso seal, battery life Opinion: What to say, I owned it for about a year and it always rapped me great shots, unfortunately but over time I found it more against than pro. Let's start from the fact that it is one of the first mirrorless, therefore a system still "unripe" in some respects especially with regard to the really poor autofocus and the iso seal also poor. The battery doesn't last long, but it's a problem sony has only chosen to address in recent years. Ergonomics is not the best, in my hands the grip is a little small.... The nice thing is that today it is also located at 600 euros or so which is definitely a great price for a 36mp fullframe The sensor is really a lot of stuff, I think it is the same as the D810, it has an excellent dynamic range, in my opinion the top for landscape photography If you can also combine third-party optics via adapters (without demanding anything from autofocus) Super recommended for those who want a great sensor or need croppare or print images while maintaining excellent quality........ sent on April 05, 2021 |
 | Sony A6300 Pros: sharpness, autofocus, compactness, excellent color rendering, silent shooting, raw file Cons: battery life, ergonomics, iso seal, Sony menu (but we're used to it) Opinion: Used for about 2 years I got very fond of it, compact with a great yield, combined with a Sony 10-18 you can put it anywhere. The color rendering is really excellent as well as the sharpness, used to do a little bit of everything: night shots, fauna and landscape has always returned me fabulous raw, of course the iso estate is not much but for the quality price ratio it is still a great compromise. But now we come to the highlight or the autofocus that is really superb, also used with Canon 70-200 f4 via sigma mc11 adductor it has rarely happened that it missed shots ... especially in continuous autofocus a real gem in short. Overall in my opinion it is really a great mirrorless and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to travel light while still maintaining excellent performance and good quality. Ps: I recommend taking a few more drums as the duration of them is very poor sent on March 26, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: construction, constant f4, tropicalized, internal zoom, backlight resistance, price of used,af Cons: vignette, bulky lampshade, lack stabilization Opinion: taken used at the modest figure of 400 euros combined with the sony a7r and canon 6d, a all-rounder lens that immediately impressed me for its resistance to the backlight, but especially for the construction (a real "tank"), I used it in any situation and I assure you that water and dust are not a problem. The dials are quite fluid, the lampshade is perhaps a little too bulky (if it can be a defect!). Ultrasonic focus is a real bijou, it works wonders; there is no stabilization, but honestly I have never missed it. At 17 mm it turns out to be unclear at the edges unless you use a rather closed diaphragm, it improves considerably by increasing the focal excursion; true, vignette a lot and the distortion stands out, but it is solved without any problem in post production. In conclusion, a great handyman that I highly recommend for landscape/architectural photos, and to all those who want to make a nice leap of quality without spending a fortune, why not, maybe replacing the 18 55.... sent on March 30, 2020 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: price of used, tropicalized, construction/ergonomics, high iso seal, battery life; wifi/gps (but they can be a con). Cons: clutter, af, fixed screen, 1/4000 Opinion: Taken used two years ago at about 600 euros and subsequently resold to switch to mirrorless, what to say.... A fantastic and super ergonomic machine body. Used in all weathers (especially in the cold) it has always held up well, excellent battery tightness, perhaps also due to construction and tropicalization. The shutter reaches 1/4000 and in cases of high brightness such as glaciers or high mountains can be a problem. As for the autofocus I could see a good reliability of the cross-centre point, the remaining 10 leave a little to be desired. 20 mp are more than good for this FF, you have the advantage of always having very beautiful and light files; certainly in my opinion in post production you will not make recoveries at the level of sony, however with a little effort you always pull out great photos. Wifi and gps can be an extra point, but not for me, never using them...... Its "battlehorse" if you can say so is the good iso estate, which makes it really great for night photographs......... in conclusion........ a great body machine that I recommend to all those who want to make a nice leap in quality in the world of reflex. sent on March 24, 2020 |
 | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Economical, stabilized, bright enough, handyman, the AF does not produce noises, lightness, distortion almost nothing at 18mm that on APS-C turns out to be a 29mm approx. Cons: No end stroke in the ring of the MAF (like all STM I think), is a lens kit base......... has its limits, lacks the lens hood, original costs a quarter of the optics... kinda a paradox Opinion: There is little to say, to begin with, is a good lens all to do because of the excursion, the lens is bright enough and sharp enough, in my opinion is not at all a bottle bottom as everyone describes it, indeed returns great photos, the Stabilization might not serve, however, in some cases with little light makes it really comfortable and allows you to shoot even at 1/10. As in fact written in the cons, the end of the race, in the MAF is a good hassle, I recommend to mark the infinite fire with a marker sent on February 15, 2019 |
 | Canon 700D Pros: Good autofocus, adjustable screen and touch, battery life, light files, excellent resistance to cold Cons: 18 MP (but they can also be a pro), Opinion: I had this camera body for about a year and I have to say that I found it very well, certainly not a super professional flagship, but with its 18 MP has been able to return me the beautiful shots, has a good resistance to ISO, certainly nothing striking but we say that He's doing it........ the swivel touch screen is really great and sensible, in my opinion very comfortable, the 18 MP (then become 24 in the next model) are a little few, however, its price, especially now that due to the output of 2 new bodies 2000d and 4000d is Down a lot. As for the autofocus, with its 9 points of MAF (which are not many, but they are fine to do a bit ' of everything), I thought it was very reliable and accurate. The construction is plasticose, does not give the idea of having a professional body in the hands, but overall I was quite comfortable, excellent even the resistance to cold, I click many times below freezing and I have to say that does not lose a shot sent on February 15, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
