|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Lorenz90 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Lorenz90  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED Pros: Sharpness, sharpness and even sharpness, color rendering, weight ridiculous price, good focus for a wide Cons: Vignetting and distortion at 18mm high, slight drop in sharpness at the edges to 35mm, slight curvature of field at 18mm Opinion: I purchased this magnificent wide-angle as a result of a comparison made between the 14-24, 16-35 and 18-35 ... rnche just say ... as sharpness practically not distinguished the difference between this and the two behemoths plasticotto more famous indeed it is well below the 16-35 !!! rnrnPresenta a slight curvature of field at 18mm which slightly reduces the yield at the far ends, the better it has to f8 / f11 to f16 becomes soft (the 14-24 is slightly than f16). Distortions and vignetting are all easily removed in the 18-35 post.rnrnTenuto neck is fabulous, almost seems not to have it, the other two never mind ... turning the car around the neck for the entire walk dolomite are unrealistic, at least for me .rnrnIl 14-24 and 16-35 are more contrasted and saturated but the differences are really subtle. In the 18-35 backlight is worse, not as regards the resistance to flare, in my opinion good, but to play as the rays of the sun ... unless defined in 18-35.rnrnin conclusion: the best wide angle lens for nikon value / prezzo (I do tamron sigma approach) .rnrnchi looking for a wide angle to a "right" price, good quality and with a weight of just 385g should at least try it! rnrn ... if anyone had any doubt about the quality of this lens = => http://www.dxomark.com/Reviews/Best-lenses-for-the-Nikon-D800E-Wide-angle-primes-and-zooms/Best-wide-angle-zooms-for-landscapes sent on September 20, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
