|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Anrea1 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Anrea1  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Viltrox AF 56mm f/1.7 Pros: Size, weight, price, image quality. Cons: Maybe maybe a little slow in the first focus. Opinion: Speaking of a lens that I paid less than 170 euros I could say a lot of yield with very little expense, and in fact it is so. Used in the evening at the amusement park I have very sharp portraits with wonderful blur. Used in the floor for sports photos (light at the minimum terms f 2.0) fast times and more than satisfactory photos. I noticed that it struggles a bit to focus in low light, and I realized that you have to anticipate the shot by half a second and the burst takes it home. I was struck by the quality of the image, the colors it restores are beautiful for me. I mount it on fuji x-t20 and I would not remove it anymore except that I use wider lenses. Curious to try the 20 mm. Well done Viltrox. sent on August 18, 2024 |
 | Nikon AF-P DX 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR Pros: Cost, diameter filters, 10 mm, backlight Cons: Definition, purple finging. Opinion: As much as it costs, it's a great goal. If we want to say it all the sharpness is not its strong. Pros: stunning camera angle, small, light, sharpened for architecture. Cons: for naturalistic photos kneads the foliage a bit, does not have the selectors on the barrel. All in all the low brightness that everyone complains I do not see, for the photos you have to do with this lens you often find yourself closing up to 16 to have depth of field. Insoma for what it costs and its versatility I would give vot 10 but for the definition of the foliage and details generally unfortunately do not deserve them. sent on June 17, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
