|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Photo_monkey www.juzaphoto.com/p/Photo_monkey ![]() |
![]() | Sony A6000 Pros: Superb image quality for the price, compactness, discrete ISO hold (if Cons: JPEG Quality Opinion: Now I use it for a year and a half and never disappointed me (or when I thought, it was because I was inexperienced and I could not use it well). For the price, it's must-buy for someone like me who just takes pictures and not videos. Coupled with good lenses, the only real limit becomes only when you are forced to pick up the ISO because, past the 800, the image degrades with speed (and it is not a problem if you have a tripod or steady hand but if you have moving targets, then it becomes a problem) But at this price and for an APSC sensor, you can't ask for more. sent on June 09, 2019 |
![]() | Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN C Pros: Exceptional sharpness, very bright, excellent construction, AF Veloccissimo Cons: A little heavy Opinion: Simply the best lens for Sony side APSC system. This lens is superlative in everything. Extremely sharp, bright and without any kind of problem (if nothing else not correctable in an immediate way in post-prod). Excellent performance even at full open, at F7/F8 The sharpness is an impressive thing. It is only slightly imgombante and a bit heavy, but otherwise there are no cons to hold. Recommended to all-even in non-stabilized body (click on the 1/24 is really tough with this lens) sent on July 01, 2018 |
![]() | Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: Incredible sharpness, excellent bokeh, stabilized Cons: Nobody Opinion: A lens from portraits outstanding. Sharp on all apertures, light, compact. Stabilization is important above all on non-stabilized body (i.e. 6000, 6300). Very good price. Like all portrait lenses (75mm like this and up), the internal use is clearly feasible but not very easy but belonging this, the lens does not have any kind of problem. Recommended sent on July 01, 2018 |
![]() | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Sharpness, great versatility, construction, compactness Cons: Price Opinion: The community despises this goal, but in my opinion it is wrong. For the use that one makes it: an excellent all do without having claims in low-light or portrait (there even if you have a fixed F4 you can not do both). Excellent stabilization and contrast. The focal equivalent (27-200) allows you to essentially make the composition you want. Very solid, compact and light. The variable aperture is not a problem also because it is difficult to use the lens at minimum apertures (less than very special cases). Only real flaw is the cost-considerable-but there the only one is to wait and look for a good deal. If one only takes pictures, this whole life compared to the Zeiss 16-70 and the Sony 18-105. sent on July 01, 2018 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me