|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vincenzo457 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vincenzo457  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS Pros: Colors, excellent sharpness, distortions contained, build quality, focus ring well-frictioned and positioned, bright, addictive. Cons: Weight and Dimentions for APSC and mirrorless, edge sharpness, non-removable lens hood, inability to use filters except slab, huge front cap. Stop. Opinion: Then... I have suffered a lot for this lens and still suffer! I Was undecided between the 10mm f2.8 and the 12mm F2 always samyang and then what do I do? I order Them both and then I keep the best... But I kept the best really?!? I State that I have a mirrorles and precisely the Fujifilm X-T2 and this has affected heavily on my choice. I Have used both lenses for almost a month and until the last I was still undecided. Both behave well about the distortion and however it corrects easily with a click in PP. I Preferred by far the 10mm for the angle of view because the 2mm plus make the difference and give you more leeway in case of correction of Perspective and related crop... But CMQ even the 12mm is not bad. The chromatic aberrations are less annoying than the 12mm and you really have to look for them in cases of contrast of light and inquadreture backlight and all in all in PP you eliminate without problems what with the 12mm is more annoying to do because the CA you notice more and even if You fix them in PP sometimes, it depends what color result you want to get, popping up in the form of uninalterable Grays. As For the sharpness I would say that wins the 12mm but not by much and however the difference is known only if you enlarge to 100% so, unless you have to print big prints, one is the other. The colours of the 10mm are more real and less emphasized than the 12mm that in PP allows you to derive any shades of colors you want... (Obviously it also depends on the shot) I found the 10mm in a macrocontrast better than in the 12mm for my liking and suffers less Flare in backlight while the 12 fatigue a bit more and shows flare even when the sun is not within the frame. With regard to the sharpness at the edges the 10mm suffers more than the 12mm that instead from 5.6 up it behaves much better. In Short, by pulling the sums the 10mm, apart from the sharpness, volume and weight, as far as I'm concerned wins over everything and the fact that costs more is not a coincidence. Pulling the sums at the end of the speech, although I would rather keep the 10mm albeit with some flaw I preferred to keep me the 12mm. Why? Coming from the world from SLR cameras I decided to switch to mirrorless especially to travel light, so my choice was conditioned by lightness (300g less about) and the size of 12mm compared to 10mm and the speech filters that the 12mm is They can safely mount. So I wanted to stay true to the mirrorless philosophy: lightness and size. Now: If you have a mirrorless and want to stay light and you are undecided like me on the 2 lenses take quietly the 12mm which however is a great lens. But If you have a reflex or you do not have problems with the weight and size and you think you do not use filters or use some plate filters take the 10mm without thinking twice! The Money's worth them all! P.S. and think that I had found it with warehausedeals at 238 Euri... Yes... Have you read well 238 Euri... Not a scratch or whatever... Still if I think about it... sent on March 23, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
