|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ventodimare www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ventodimare  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic S1 Pros: Excellent viewfinder Cons: Weight, paid video software, autofocus not at most Opinion: I used this machine for a few days, but I still wonder why I have to spend three times the market price of the Sony A7II and a lot more than the AIII to have the same old-generation sensor. Sure holds the Isos, but I would also like to see with a number of pixels from apsc. In short, Panasonic has "wise" the soil of the full format with a product certainly good, but with too much already seen and that in fact has its main use in the video field so that it can be assimilated to an evolved camcorder with which to take even photos. sent on May 27, 2020 |
 | Pentax K-70 Pros: Stabilized sensor and excellent high iso quality, handling, easy and rational controls, robustness Cons: low-life battery life Opinion: I bought this Pentax, a brand that I have always considered excellent, for a specific purpose, to help me in the astrophotography of the deep sky that I prefer to do without connection to a telescope, but with rather pushed photographic canvases that have less aberrations than rapid astronomical instruments with costs within my reach. I have a large terrace that unfortunately is covered to the north and this prevents me from being able to set the chaser on the polar star with the necessary precision: I thought that the astrotracer of this machine could help me and in fact compensates very well for the error of the pursuer allowing me to set myself from 10 minutes to half an hour. Above all, it allows me to shoot many poses from one or two minutes each by keeping the image in the same area of the sensor. If you take into account that the sensor holds the high iso well (rarely, however, I exceed 3200), much better than another full reflex formed by revered brand. I would say that it was a purchase more than apt and that also allows me to make excellent shots also of landscape. sent on May 01, 2020 |
 | Pentax KP Pros: Almost everything Cons: What is the point of the K3? Opinion: Without prejudice to the excellent quality and definition of the images that gives a twist even to full format, I do not understand this type of operation, since compared to the K3 second series there is only the viewer partially orientable and few other differences that However they could have been easily studied on the K3, without those evolutions on the video side that perhaps were expected. In short, as for Nikon with the D3500 (however, a toy compared to Kp) it is a facelift, while the quality of the sensor and the computer hardware that accompanies it, would perhaps have deserved much more, for example the transformation of the machine into a Mirrorless (technically it is quite simple, not to say trivial, even if it is presented by the builders as a revolutionary thing to increase prices). She would have been the absolute best in her segment. sent on January 23, 2019 |
 | Nikon D5 Pros: Speed ??and precision af, burst, relative ease of use, connections, battery life Cons: excessive and unjustified price, weight, product dedicated solely to sports Opinion: I do not think that the D5 is a flagship as many are led to believe the stratospheric price and for some reason even unjustified, but it is a machine specifically dedicated to sports photography to its needs or even better to the needs of sports photographers who need press the shutter button and not be so much thinking, to send fast images of good quality without too many problems of resolution or even post production, to have a substantial autonomy and not having to be too much to work on the settings. In this field excels, but outside of this scope I do not see the need to faint for it, even in studio photography, in the landscape, architectural not to mention street or other not only is not superior to the same products of the Nikon house , but often takes them. For the rest like all the tests I could see and those that I personally did, even if a little 'to the garibaldina. they visually demonstrate that at 12800 ISO starts to rumble, even if less than other fullf frames, they revealjust doses a car of this land and leaving the imagination to the 3 million and passes of ISO. I would then like to see that with 20 megapixels on the full format, it did not even have a fair range yield. In conclusion, it is a machine that is specialized and unsuitable for general photography, which in a sense as a niche product, justifies its price commercially. sent on February 15, 2018 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Nobody Cons: Nobody Opinion: I still do not have this lens although I intend to buy it as soon as possible and therefore I can not say anything. However, I was struck by the insistent reference to a lack of tropicalization of the lens that, unlike normal and canvas, "appears" is particularly exposed to moisture and dust. In reality, with relatively little expense and a minimum of manual skill, you can tropicalize any machine or lens much better than the manufacturer can do: just use the new anti-humidity and anti-dust nanomolecular insulation designed for electronic and electrical circuits. Because they not only prevent the entry of dust, water and humidity, but expel that already present and protects against oxidation and corrosion.They are used for marine and submarine electronic equipment: if you sprinkle with great care (it is small spray cans ) the points of the machine and / or objectives (but also because of mobile phones) not only improves steadilythe electric contact, but you can safely work in the rain and snow without problems. The really good products (a d800 I fell in the water and remained there for several tens of seconds coming out intact and working without even need for anchovy) cost a bit ', but certainly less so many hurricanes that serve to raise prices. sent on February 13, 2018 |
 | Nikon Coolpix P900 Pros: Extraordinary focal length, excellent stabilization, good optics Cons: low autonomy, a lot of plastic, lack of raw Opinion: I'm sorry where to contradict the many shop professionals, who are a bit behind and afflicted by a quality concept anchored to the A2 press, but these megazoom bridges and in particular the P900 open up completely new horizons to photography. Of course the sensors are small and the noise grows with Iso, even if the speech is much more complex and a backlit sensor is worth the same as one with the circulation in the head, but offer the possibility of shots impossible with any camera unless you spend as if to buy a car and still resort to delusive optical gimmicks for image quality. I bought the P900 as a complement to the photographic kit and I must say that even in general use does not disfigure at all, even if its specific use is naturalistic and allow allows to capture from a distance details that with "normal" machines would require a strong cropping and thus rebalancing the quality. Of course it is better not to exceed 400 ISO, but in its limit allows cotherwise impossible. The only real flaw is the lack of the raw format that does not allow a proper post production sent on February 01, 2018 |
 | Nikon D850 Pros: Resolution Cons: noise, very heavy files Opinion: I got to do about 2000 shots with this machine and I must say that I did not understand it: why to get the sensor of so many megapixels virtually useless unless you want to make mega posters, to have much more noise than less sensors crowded and forced to buy top targets for not having modest results. Who is this machine for? Certainly not to studio professionals who use the nedia format, or certainly to those who report and needs immediacy and lightness, nor to art photographers who see themselves subtract the classic 1600 iso to which this Nikon goes into crisis . It is aimed at amateur photographers or professions before the digital age, impressed by megapixels and eager for the "mac book" thinking that it is faster than ever. This consumerist illiteracy in terms of computer science is a revelation of the average purchaser of this 850 that beyond some specialized sectors, has everything to envy to 810. sent on February 01, 2018 |
 | Sony A7 II Pros: handling. good viewfinder, good stabilization Cons: battery life, little intuitive menu, slow autofocus Opinion: I appreciate Sony's Alfa series because it encompasses quality in a small, lightweight body. However, I confess that I would have expected more from a full-format, overstretched sensor that is not very large in terms of megapixels: the dynamic range and the noise control return results very close to the peak cps. Excellent for the report (even if the wi fi is missing) and the urban photographic zingaratre, however, gives the impression of a design uncertainty of Sony and the entire photographic industry more generally than after 15 years of megapixel ride, buffer speeding and improvement of image processors somehow seek to artificially differ substantially substantially similar products. sent on January 31, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
