|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mattia 0utDatedGuy www.juzaphoto.com/p/Mattia0utDatedGuy  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF-S DX 16-80mm f/2.8-4 E ED VR Pros: Great sharpness, colors "35mm 1.8 DX", Absolute resistance to flare, awesome VR Cons: vignetting, Plasticose Construction Although better than the kit lenses Opinion: I was really wary of this lens for everything I had read and especially thought I would regret the 24-120 F/4 which I was slightly too long in wide angle but constructively more robust, solid and heavier. Past to try it a little ' and driven by the curiosity of this 16-80 (which is the perfect equivalent for aps-c size of 24-120mm) I had to deeply recreate its capabilities. It has really faithful colors, it is very sharp at any focal length at f/4, at 16mm open to 2.8 it is still really sharp (a hair below the edges but we are talking about levels of excellence). I have yet to put it to the whip in really difficult situations that can happen to a professional photographer in the newspaper but I already realized that "pasta" is Made. The idea that leaves you is that it is the nerdy but super technological and intelligent brother of the biggest and muscular 17-55, classic so many muscles and little brain. Can you shoot without moving up to 1/8 sec without choppy! It has a really awesome VR, try to believe it. Therefore do not regret the focal of a fixed f/2.8 because he even when it is at F/4 it makes you recover light thanks to its technology. It has an almost annoying anti-glare treatment from how effective it is.... even when you'd like the flare by shooting it against the sun he doesn't want to know. It also manages to eliminate haze given by UV rays when you point away in sunny days. Focal length I would say perfect multipurpose, maybe a short hair if you are accustomed to something more Lunghino type 18-105 or simili....ma on the other hand.... the quality you pay. Could it be considered a professional aim DX? Yes certainly, although I find it unlikely that for the needs of a professional you go to consider this lens for a sensor little resistant to iso, maybe for sporty use.... but in that case is usually preferred something more specific, a 80-200 For example. Anyway if you are amateurs and want the top of the top, reluctantly... I must admit that is the lens you Seek. sent on October 08, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: (on aps-c): Zero vignetting, zoom rather pushed equivalent, colors, flares obvious (to those who like): Cons: (on aps-c): sharpness that leaves to be desired on D7100, not total resolution of the M-pixel of the sensor, F/4 constant in the wide angle measures a little hole. Opinion: I found it a fantastic lens in many respects, construction plasticose but of quality, very solid, heavy and "present" thing that on D7100 I find a pro as it well scales the camera body giving you a lens feeling once when held the whole thing for Shoulder strap. It has an excellent yield for shades and colors, a nice fuzzy definitely superior to almost any DX lens having its 9 blades in place of the most popular 7. Unfortunately it is a little ' wasted on the small size a bit ' for the wide range that is often narrow (but it depends on what you have to do and if you want to go below the 24mm), and a bit ' for the brightness of the lens that is often a value in the lengths Longer focal lengths and one against 24 to almost 50mm. In the end I had the opportunity to sell it well to prove its legitimate equivalent for aps-c 16-80 2.8-4, which at the moment is giving me satisfaction even if constructively inferior and much lighter, with vignetting and absolute resistance to flare. Returning to the 24-120 I can add that enjoys an excellent system of stabilization VR. (lower than the 16-80). Beautiful lens that maybe it is worth exploiting in full on FF, but also on aps-c I think you will not be Disappointed. sent on October 08, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Sharpness, soft focus, price Cons: Very light aberrations and purple fringing Opinion: Fantastic lens in quality / price ratio, if you want to start making photography with the mind is the best "fifty" classic available on aps-c. Given the focal length if you buy it with a specific purpose carefully weigh the choice, I use it for events often as crowded as the disco as a second lens: it is obviously not versatile but really returns surprising colors and bright, fast and accurate autofocus. One of the few lenses "made in Thailand" to be proud of! sent on January 12, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
