|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Flavio Villa www.juzaphoto.com/p/FlavioVilla  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM Zuiko 200mm f/4 Pros: Cost of used, bright, image quality more than discreet, bokeh. Cons: Chromatic aberrations . Opinion: Purchased for the precise need to photograph twilight fauna, possibly setting them so its brightness is fundamental. Having taken it a few days ago, I only tried it at zero km and the impressions are generally good. The only real flaw are the chromatic aberrations that are often and willingly present, which discourages not a little but when you manage to avoid them, you take home satisfying shots. I did several close ups with extension tubes, portraits, fauna and, for the negligible cost, I am satisfied. I wait to use it in a low light . I really like the bokeh. A TA is not a sample of sharpness but for the use that I will make of it (I repeat, animals set) I do not need the super detail or super sharpness precisely. For the cost it has, you can safely buy it without thinking too much. At worst, it is resold. sent on February 22, 2022 |
 | Olympus PEN E-P2 Pros: Small, light, does hers, duty Cons: Non-touch display and barely visible sun. Opinion: I come from his little sister E-p5 (great) and E-M1mark2. I took at 90 euros this little gem for when I do outings in Mtb ,undemanding trips and to be ultra light. I used it still little photographing insects and landscapes. At first glance it looks like a toy and to shoot in manual it is a bit "cumbersome" having no dials dedicated to ISO, times etc but after getting familiar I could enjoy its use. The Jpeg files I liked immediately and in good light I did not notice big differences from the older sisters. Even crunching, his 12mpxl shows the claws. Of course I won't use it for birds but never say never. For now I am fully satisfied with my mule and often leave my flagship at home without any second thoughts. Great price/quality. sent on June 17, 2020 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm f/4.8-6.7 II Pros: Very light, compact, mounts screw ND filters, cheap, made in general. Cons: Not tropicalized. Opinion: Paid 280 euros used, with lampshade, for me it is a godsend to be able to make long treks in the mountains without feeling the weight. In full light the results are excellent (compared to its segment) but as soon as the light goes down, it limps. In aid comes the excellent oly body stabilizer that allows you to stretch the times a lot even by freehand (I shot at 1/60 without motion). In birdlife the mm is never enough and I always find myself shooting at 300mm but I find that there is no drastic drop in sharpness... indeed, perhaps I have a well-made specimen. It can mount screw ND filters to get creative shots. Too bad it's not tropicalized but it would mean demanding the full barrel and the drunk wife. I don't regret it at all. sent on March 05, 2020 |
 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pros: Screen, speed of use Cons: Camera not up to par. Opinion: I took it because I was attracted to its sensor (of 108mpx I don't care). I must say that already from the first shots (jpeg) the photos are piled in to the details, watercolor... I guess it's the intervention of the software. I have yet to see the RAW because it immediately shut down and I sent it to assistance. I'd like to test it in poor light. Difficult-to-use macro lens... despite the peacking focus I had a hard time sewing where I wanted to. I think it has software that doesn't live up to the hardaware, where the numbers on the card are there. Overall judgment postponed to other tests For the rest I seem to be an optician phone, but I'm one who does not stress him... open 4/5 app at most together, i don't play or anything else. Still to be tested audio side. sent on February 28, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
