|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Crucco www.juzaphoto.com/p/Crucco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM Pros: Cost dimensions weight quality ' Cons: With regard to cost, no. In absolute terms, the 'IS would have been useful Opinion: I've had for two years a 70-200 IS II. This has the same quality but fuzzy undoubtedly better. I had already had in the past and when I made the transition from this to the zoom II was hurt because of the inferior quality of the fuzzy 70-200 It is also smaller and lighter. I sold 70-200 II and taking this. 200 2.8 L II can carry almost always with me, while zooming stayed home. I'm glad of the passage and I were also fine pocket money :-) sent on June 14, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Pros: Opening, sharpness, blur, compactness and light weight (relatively open) Cons: I would like a little 'less distortion in Opinion: My optical handyman. I love it. I love his focus, his ability to shoot in low light, resistance to flare, softness veiled in backlight, sharpness already at room temperature, which becomes wild when you close af/2.rnCi do everything, and I'm using it lot even for wide-angle landscapes, instead of zoom expensive but they have flaws that this lens does not know. Better an angle of less, but better results .... RNE 'the perfect finish? Almost ..... imho deserves a little 'less distortion. Not that I have much, but if he did not, I'd be happier. ;-) RnrnImpressioni based on 4 years of using two different sample and thousands of photos taken ;-) sent on August 04, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price. Opening. Lightness. Held against the light. Absence of flare. Value / price unbeatable and undefeated so far. Cons: At this price, practically NOTHING! Opinion: To realize this goal, you must have tried or own, most popular and expensive optics: just so you can understand that to have excellent performance no need to spend astronomical sums. I have owned in the past, this' optical and I did not understand ..... After using most prestigious lenses, I wanted to take the plunge to re-buy it, and I realize that this toy has its work cut because ....! RnHa its flaws, but that's okay ..... very well .... Better than many zooms, even L. GNI '1.2 useful to those who know how to use it to 1.2 and it is not simple, not so much the technique (which can be learned), but for the necessary creativity ..... rnL'1 .4 lens is the more anonymous I've tried: I did pass the desire to scattare.rnL '1 .8 you put it on, open up everything and start shooting: the bokeh will be filled with lights and asymmetrical raw, that will horrify the purists, but that will give the air vintage you want. You put it against the light, and photos veleranno a magical aura (which will horrify the purists of the sharpzza) .... rnPerò this is what I want from a 50: character, personality and immediacy. For the sharpness etc.. there are 24-70 I and II, 50 1.2 (obviously closed ...). A 50, imho should do what it does questo.rnPoi coast from 75 to 100 euro ..... but what more could you want ... ? ;-) sent on August 04, 2013 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Size, high ISO management, WiFi, HDR Room Cons: HDR in the room (only jpeg) Opinion: I come from 5D and 5D MKII, and this camera, I was expecting only a small improvement of the already 'high quality' of predecessors. Instead, I realized after a few shots that this is a different machine from the "sisters" take the high ISO in impressive fashion, maintaining a great detail and an extended dynamic range, even at ISO extremes as 16,000 or 25,600. rnrnQuesta quality ', makes the difference between being able to use a' point of view, or having to leave home. I refer to lenses as the 24-70 or the 135 f / 2, which I have always deemed slow "by day". With 6D I can carry around, and dare ilibera hand, even in low light or after tramonto.rnrnL 'AF has improved a lot, and allows you to take fast even in low light. The lateral points finally work (the comparison is with the "old" 5D). Maybe a little flaw 'reading with little contrast, but all in all I think satisfactory' s upgrade from MKII.rnrnUtile the HDR in the room but I was disappointed with the NOT configurability 'of this option: you can' do only jpeg, and you will notNgono even saved shots fork, then left alone with the jpeg finished in HDR without the possibility 'of change (such as the MKIII). rnSecondo my point of view, it is totally useless GPS, but I think that will' easy to photojournalist. Interestingly, WiFi, allowing you to control the 6D using a smartphone by downloading the 'free appropriate APP for Android or iOS.rnrnLe size and weight, are another point in favor of the 6D: finally a full frame small, compact and lightweight . rnrnSecondo me, is a huge machine, which will become 'the new benchmark for the segment FF semipro.rnrnRiccardo sent on December 15, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
