|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
GiuseppeDeSantis96 www.juzaphoto.com/p/GiuseppeDeSantis96  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Pros: Compactness, Image quality, stabilization, robustness, good dynamic range considering the sensor, ISO up to 4000 ISO acceptance and containable in post, optical park Cons: A bit plasticky, battery of 6 politicians, Iso above 6400, the menu (if you are not used to it) Opinion: Taken a few years ago to replace the E-M5 Mark II, the leap in quality of the sensor from 16mpx to this is quite appreciable and noticeable especially in the fine detail which is really excellent considering the modest 20.4mpx. The build quality gives a sense of excellent robustness despite the use of polycarbonate and not metal, which I would have preferred as in the previous version. On shadow recovery, considering that we are talking about an M4/3 sensor, it behaves more than well but obviously you have to be careful with exposure and ISO. The latter are also decently manageable up to 3200 almost on a par with an Apsc, in some conditions even 4000 iso especially considering the new noise reduction functions of some software such as lightroom. A 6400 is really to be used only in extreme cases, above pretend they don't exist. It helps a lot to manage these factors to have a large lens park with very generous apertures at unthinkable costs (I recommend, try the sigma 56 1.4) and the stabilization on the sensor that made me shoot up to 1 second handheld. Of course, it would be as nice as for the later model, to have some more effective computational functions, such as Freehand High Resolution and Live ND. That said, the battery is only just enough, but just take a couple more and you're good to go. I think it is, net of the polycarbonate construction, one of the most successful and balanced models ever, as far as the Micro 4/3 philosophy is concerned: a well-made compact body, tropicalized, very customizable, light with fantastic optics to take anywhere that really offers an image quality that even today, although an outdated sensor, still says its own very clearly. Recommended, rating 9.5 sent on October 10, 2025 |
 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 III Pros: QUALITY PRICE REPORT, Not a considerably "entry level", improved and intuitive menu, lightweight, handy, aesthetics in general, key function menu key, 5-axis stabilization, build quality, even yield up to 6400, color rendering, Autofocus from 121pt. Cons: Ineffective stabilization in free-time evening shots with shutter speeds of less than 1/15, a bit noisy in these latest conditions, battery a bit short but easily solvable with backup batteries. Opinion: I preferred m10 mkIII instead of Em-5 mkII after an initial indecision. I believe that apart from some features of the em5 (high-res, Tropicalization) that I do not care much about, the m10 mkIII despite being inserted in the "entry-level" band does not act at all as such, also because in the actual the sensor is the same, but slightly larger for the m10 (m10 13x17,4 vs em5 13x17,3), 5-axis stabilization is identical, as well as megapixels, even here slightly in favor of m10 16.1 vs 16. La rendering of colors is exceptional as well as sharpness. Excellent photo mode (AP) features. Unfortunately for now I was able to test the m10 only with the kit lenses 14-42 IIR f3.5-5.6 and 40-150 R f4-5.6, which are not bad with good lighting but practically unusable in free hand in light conditions poor and in the evening, but this one already knows well before buying, although I expected something more. THEStabilization with 5 axes per shot (not in all situations) and video is incredible, certainly not "entry level". Highly recommended. sent on October 24, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
