| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
 |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.
 |
Nikon AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8 D ED Pros: Versatility, low weight, dynamic range Cons: Slight loss of sharpness at the edges. Opinion: Used for about 10 years on D200-D750-D850. From the beginning he always whistled for the first two seals but never brought fire problems even in highly cold situations below zero. Suitable for day and night landscaping. With a soft opening in the tonal passages with a slight loss of sharpness at the edges, some very normal coma in the night photos always in the extreme edges where there are point light sources such as stars. It also holds the 45 mpx well. Compared to a specimen 20 mm 1.8 exceeded it. sent on 16 Aprile 2021 |
 |
Nikon AF-S 24mm f/1.4 G ED Pros: Optical, blurry quality, backlight management, dynamic range, construction Cons: Diaphragm 1.4 some normal chromatic aberration and coma on the margins but always behaves better than a zoom Opinion: Great construction that should be magnesium alloy that many confuse with plastic. I had two models that I could test; I can argue that there may be performance variations between one model is L other. Almost absent distortion, vignette only at 1.4 and 1.8, incredible blur, backlight with very few flares, refraction almost absent even with closed diaphragm. You'd appreciate it even better with a 100 mpx Rating 10/10 sensor sent on 14 Dicembre 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
