|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nicu95 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nicu95  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Compact, lightweight, wide-angle, stabilised, focus speed, it's free (they throw it back with any Sony APS-C). Cons: Distortion, chromatic aberration, vignetting, F 3.5 up to 19 mm. Opinion: Big lens, nice results, compact lens, poor results... it's the law of nature in the world of photography. This lens is designed for the world's mirrorless APS-C, definition of ' compact '. Do not claim the same rendition of a Canon 18-55 lens that is 4 times larger and heavier. Obviously the photos with this lens are not that great qualitatively, but to be a good photographer do not have to race to those who have the biggest lens, look at the photos below the reviews, all great shots with a plastic lens made by real photographers. I think it's worth keeping it and not changing it, in my kit I have an 8 mm fish eye f2.8 and a 16mm sigma f1.4, the best combination to give up this quarter-called lens, and yet I still keep it for when I travel and I want to only get this lens and a 50- 210. Very useful in video due to the stabilization. Very fast Autofocus. 16 mm very useful. Thank goodness you can not deactivate the distortion correction otherwise it would be a kind of bad fish eye:)) for personal use and compactness if you want to travel light absolutely recommended, but if you want to take a step forward in the wide angle Better buy another lens. Photo quality: 6; Video quality: 8 (thanks to the stabilization); Build Quality: 7; Dimensions and portability: 10. sent on February 13, 2019 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Ergonomics, optical park, infinite battery, excellent construction, intuitive menu as on all canon. Cons: ISO seal, dynamic range, video 30fps, gust, Heavy, 1/4000 (but given the burst you can not ask for more), display not orientable, resolution, colors. Opinion: has only positive the 5 things I wrote above... then the dark. Holder of Sony a6000 and Samsung NX2000 and 3000. I say... let's try a little the world of full frame canon... bad idea! Thank goodness I had it in test for some GG and I have not spent money to have it! Really obscene! I'm comparing 1 machine from 300 euro only body, with a 1200 euro only body: I say... 20 MPX FF sensor, definitely a stellar ISO seal... useless FF sensor (holds the ISO worse than the Sony that has the APS-C), which sense has put ISO extended to 100,000 if already at 2000 you V Ede worse than my Sony at ISO 3200? I state that I had the Sigma 24mm f1.4, a spectacular objectivity for sharpness, while on Sony I had the 50mm f 1.8, bottomed in comparison to Sigma, and yet Oh, nothing, it does not make it! I say... oh well, I solve in PP... But what?!? Insufficent dynamic range and indecent automatic white balance. Canon, remove those gosh filters on the sensor!!! I say... patience, will only be the ISO the problem... I put the Canon 50mm f 1.8, compared to Sony with the same lens of its own brand, to see the definition of the sensor, nothing, a crap. Low resolution to make way for a high ISO seal? Wrong! Both poor, both ISO and resolution. I say... all that boast the colors of the canon as the best... disgusting here too! The Sony is even worse in the colors, but at least I have so much dynamic range to solve in PP. The Samsung with its nx3000 machine from 150 Euro with objective kit included, beats several both canon and Sony. Photo Part rejected Great! I say... at least it will be good for videos... again a flop! Only 30fps in 2013?!? The Sony was doing the 1080p 60fps from the time of N5. The quality is the same as the photos, unwatchable! I tried a bunch of Canon APS-C, from the 1000d, to the 7d, all bad compared to Sony. Let's give a pertaining to the average FF? (I'm not talking about irragiungible things like 1DX or 5d IV)... moral of the Fable: never more Canon in my life, prices of much above average and obscene quality of sensors. Photo part: 4; Video part: 4; Build Quality: 9. sent on February 08, 2019 |
 | Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Pros: All Cons: Not having had it Opinion: Unbelievable but true! I am an avid user of Note 4 after 4 and a half years from its release! Still today I refuse to sell or change it! I own the version with 64-bit OCTA Core 910C processor (which are practically 2 processors with 4 clusters each). Bought in October 2014, it holds great. The factory battery died 2 years ago, but with 20 euros I took another original Samsung. Amazing phone for functions! He's got everything you need! It's a bit old to be bought now, but if you want a phone within 120 euros, go on this! The S-pen makes you forget not to have a tablet, because of his fault I sold the computer and the tablet, since I have this phone I do not use them! Even today I discover new features! He even owns the headphone jack!!!! We have a 128 GB Miro SD do not even hear the ' only ' 32 GB internal. Andoid is a world you have to know how to use, if you do it right the phone will last a lifetime. The story that IOS lasts better than Andoid has died since the days of the iphone 3GS. I have owned S2, S3 and now notes 4 from 4 years and passes, how many of you Apple fan boy do you still have iphone 6 (the same iphone that came out at the same time as Note 4)?? ' I'll take the Aifone 7 because it lasts more than the Andoidde ' now all with iphone Xs... But give me the pleasure! The note 9 convinces me, August aspect, if Samsung pulls out an even better notes I'll take the 10 (or whatever the name is), otherwise I'll go on the 9 with 512 GB. Buy Apple with horns and you will make the same end! :)) sent on February 05, 2019 |
 | Samsung NX2000 Pros: Price, sensor quality, compactness, touch screen, multi-purpose wheel, excellent grip. Cons: Display with little resolution, few manual controls, battery holds little, ISO tightness no more than yes, objective 20-50 bad. Opinion: Great machine to get an idea of the photography and to get started. It costs very little, 100 and Qualconsina euro with goal, but I highly recommend to search for a 16-50 used, on the internet you find it a little money. Excellent file quality. The automatisms and the white balance are excellent. It has the multipurpose wheel Single that if you learn to use it makes it very manageable to use even in manual. Big flaw of these compact Samsung is the fact that you can not change the exposure, but even worse is that you do not stay at 0, often goes to-3 or + 3 as if nothing was. Decent Autofocus. Good ISO tightness, but not great, above the 1600 pretty bad. Touch screen Display excellent for autofocus but so slow in the menu. Hard to find good targets, the Pancakes 20mm F 2.4 and 30mm F2 are convenient, but they are impossible to find. In short, great machine to start learning to take pictures considering the price. Photo quality: 8; Video quality: 6.5; Build Quality: 6. sent on February 04, 2019 |
 | Samsung NX3000 Pros: Price, Folding screen, ISO seal, excellent automatic white balance, good autofocus, compact, good battery, micro SD. Cons: No chance to change the exposure, lack of lenses, lack of flash (at least integrated), display with little resolution. Opinion: Great machine to enter the world of photography. With this I started, then for lack of lenses, flash, accessories, I switched to the world Sony, while still remaining in mirrorless. I state that comparing this to the Sony a6000 (more or less same launch date) has nothing to envy the Sony sensor, perhaps a little better than the ISO seal of Sony. Samsung has worked well on this machine, but what strikes the most is the price. Now you do not find it new, but used costs very little about 120 Euro body plus 16-50 kit lens. Definitely a good deal! A tele 50-200 you find it at 160-180 euros, and here is made a nice starter kit! The ISO estate is excellent considering the price, with an entry level canon already at 800 ISO throw the file, with this salts quietly at ISO 800 without any noise, at 1600 in PP solve the little noise that you create, over the 3200 becomes a bit of a problem. The automatisms of the machine are excellent, the white balance equally accurate, even better than Sony. In manual mode is an agony can not change the exposure, it's all automatic and often you go to + 3 or a-3 like nothing. Good autofocus, although it's not a splinter like on the Sony. Very useful micro SD, talking clearly, between SD and micro SD Now the differences are few, I have a micro SD 256 GB with 100MB/s writing, perfect even for XVCA s 4k, which still use on Sony with adapter. The viewfinder is missing or at least a better display resolution. The battery holds well, but it could better considering its 2330 mah. In short, excellent machine to start, but if you want to take a step forward and make progress in the world of photography you have to change the environment, here you have few goals and hard to find (the 16-50 f2-2.8 made me gorge but... 1000euro!!!), also lack of third party goals. You have adapters for vintage lenses, but goodbye autofocus, and also the focus peaking is not one of the best. Same story with the flashes and accessories, unobvable. Photo quality: 10; Video quality: 7 (lack of 60fps and AVCHD and Xvac s) Build quality: 8.5. sent on January 31, 2019 |
 | Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS Pros: Compact, lightweight, good build quality, very fast autofocus, stabilized, excellent value for money. Cons: Dark, photo quality not the best, if you put the parasular to the contrary goodbye focus ring. Opinion: Do you want quality from 70-200 f4? Buy the 70-200 f4 or anytime other lens that costs between 5 and 10 times this and forget the unnecessary chatter that this lens sucks! This is a great goal, very useful in many respects especially if you have good light and little money =) Autofocus fast, takes everything! The stabilization is great, it makes you get off half the shutter speed and this compensates for the maximum aperture of F 6.3. Decent quality of the photos and still workable in PP. Few chromatic aberrations and distortion absent. Who likes to criticize this lens remember that it costs 200e! You can not expect from a slow from 200euro the same quality of a 1500 euro lens! Photo and video quality: 7.5; Build Quality: 8.5. To have in the outfit if you want to keep your budget low. sent on January 31, 2019 |
 | Samyang 8mm f/2.8 UMC Fisheye II Pros: Sharpness, excellent construction, compact, very versatile, inexpensive. Cons: Smooth focus ring. Opinion: I state that I possess the first version of the lens for Sony, but I also had the second on Samsung NX. In terms of quality absolutely no difference, the difference is in weight, the second version has one more lens and the rear element is wider, probably better distributes the light on the sensor. Excellent lens If you like the fish eye optics. F 2.8 is a decent opening also for indoor or night-scapes. Obviously, given the desired distortion, do not expect that the sharpness at the edges is the same as the center, however it is very sharp the lens. Beautiful lens solid and durable, to a friend of mine has fallen and, never seen until now, is not broken!!! It still works great, Baloditivo! Photo and video quality: 8.5. Build Quality: 9.5. Focal length of 8mm and goodbye to autofocus, piglia almost everything in focus, only with subjects closer than 1.5 meters you have to do some attention. If you do not like this type of optics do not take it, if you have never tried it, buy it and you will not regret it, if ever you can resell at a great price given the fact that it is not very second hand. sent on January 31, 2019 |
 | Sony E 50mm f/1.8 OSS Pros: Compact, stabilized, fast autofocus, crisp, inexpensive if taken second hand. Cons: Poor materials, but it is justified by the price, focus ring not so precise and very ' plasticose '. Opinion: A ' must have ' objective. Particularly sharp compared to the canon and Nikon counterpart but with the advantage of being stabilized. At f2.8 the sharpness is excellent, between F4 and F 6.3 You have the maximum sharpness. Some chromatic aberration at f 1.8 but nothing serious. Surely there are other chromatic aberrations from F8 up, but considering the focal length I don't think you'll ever use it at this aperture. Also great for video. Combined with Sony a6500 the stabilization is superb. Photo and video quality 9.5. Build Quality 6.5. 50 mm are a single focal, or you can not use it for anything, if you want, better a 35 mm paired with a 85, do almost everything, otherwise better match the 50mm a 16mm or a fish eye for landscape and street fotography. Given the price and the quality it pulls out to have in the outfit. sent on January 31, 2019 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: Excellent value for money. Excellent photo quality with a good lens. Excellent videos in XAVC format S. Very fast focusing in the photos, even in manual with the excellent use of focus peaking. Adjustable screen. Excellent use of the integrated flash. Super Compact. Cons: Few points of phase and contrast detection. Slow focus in video (but depends on what lens you use). Lack of third party lenses with stabilizer. Mancaza Jack for microphone. Opinion: I love this car! I have it for over a year and still I get satisfactions from chills! Taken at a price: 450 euro approx. with 16-50 kits and 55-210. Spent other 300 for 50mm f 1.8 Sony and 8mm fish-eye f2.8 Samyang. Next objective: Sigma 16mm f1.4. Exceptional sensor quality; For example I tried a Samyang 35 mm f1.4 canon with Speedbooster which makes it practically become a 25mm F 1.1, a monstrous thing! Going down to F4 the sharpness is stellar for an APS-C. The same lens on his canon makes photos that you can watch. Not to mention the Dynamic Range that is comparing sacred FF monsters Canon and Nikon will dream of. Sony has worked really well on its sensors! Excellent ISO seal for an APS-C, up to 1600 almost nothing, up to 6400 definitely usable and still adjustable in PP. Very fast Autofocus in the photos, it has good phase detection points but contrast detection was. However, the autofocus speed is significantly higher than many commercially available DSLRs. Photographic part promoted with flying colors! Where it creps a little is in the video part. The quality is outstanding in XAVC s, even better than a6300 in 1080p, but you need a SD of at least 80 MB/s write. The problems are 2: autofocus and stabilization. About the first one resolves with a good goal, but still it remains quite slow in the videos. Regarding the second the stabilization is bad even in Sony lenses, I do not ask for stabilization on the sensor but at least a good stabilized lens of third parties. No matter what stabilization lens you have, there's always a need for gimbal or Steadicam. button to record randomly, scomodissimo, but apparently at Sony like since it has always put them also on the brand new a6400:( Another small problem is the lack of jack to capture the sound, but the problem is risove with a cheap recorder to put in place of the flash that records audio separately and then overlaps it in PP (those few times that you will need audio live to POS of music). Part photo rated 10. Video part rated 7.5 (Quality 10 ma Autofocus and Stabilization 5). Considering the price and the portability absolutely to have! sent on January 24, 2019 |
 | Samsung NX 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED OIS III Pros: Great picture quality, very few chromatic aberrations. Great focusing speed. Good stabilization. Good value for money. Rubber ring nut, excellent grip. Cons: Poor construction quality. Opinion: Taken together with my NX 3000 to a prank: 300 euro machine with 16-50 + lens 50-200. For the price is a great lens "must have". The construction is poorly enough, too much plastic, a well-made, but too sensitive (if slid down) self-tapping ring, a ring of no focus and sensitive to almost any movement. The quality of the pictures is excellent, most of the photos I did did not need post production. Great stabilization of both photo and video. sent on September 28, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
