|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca Sacchi www.juzaphoto.com/p/LucaSacchi  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma SD Quattro H Pros: Machine body quality, unrivaled jpeg (if not in the MF), ease of use, the right conditions made by the pro without compromise in quality, b / n comparable only to the leica monochrome. Cons: Battery life, "iso" iso hold (color no more than 400 iso, in b / n even 1600 where it generates a pleasant grain), difficulty in finding optics and accessories. Opinion: I recently bought this car body, aware (thanks to the few discussion forums) of the field of use. I decided to make it the only body, selling the previous kit (d300 + various optics). 100 bucks the breath. Every generated photo ranges from 65 mb to 500 that came out with the SFD option. Great yield up to 400, beyond becomes good for the web, but loses a lot in print. Slow processing program (for file size) needs a good pc behind it. Precise but slow autofocus (already budgeted, so I do not bother you). The only chance that made me lose my nose was during the first session; The battery life is embarrassing (I had to buy two spare parts in anticipation of a trip). For the rest, as previously estimated by the previous review, is not a system comparable to the Bayer technology flow. You acquire aware of what you can offer. And in its comfort zone, the yield is better than any current ff systemYou trade. sent on July 25, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
