JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Sigma SD Quattro H : Specifications and Opinions

The Sigma SD Quattro H is a mirrorless camera with APS-H (1.3x) sensor and 44 megapixels manufactured from 2016 to 2021 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 6400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 3.8 FPS x 10 RAW, 10 JPEG. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1366 €;

27 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10

Sensor
Format	APS-H, 28 x 18.6 mm (image ratio 3:2, crop factor 1.3x in comparison with FF)
Resolution	44 megapixel
ISO sensitivities	100 - 6400
File formats	JPEG, RAW
Esposure
Shutter speeds	30" - 1/4000
Exp. compensation	+/- 5 stops at 1/3 steps
Exp. modes	M, S, A, P
Metering modes	Multi-Area, Semi-Spot, Spot
Features
Mount	Sigma SA (click here to view all compatible lenses)
Stabilization	No
Autofocus (AF areas)	9
Continuos shooting (with autofocus)	3.8 FPS x 10 RAW, 10 JPEG
Continuos shooting (without autofocus)	3.8 FPS x 10 RAW, 10 JPEG
Pre-Burst	No
Live View	Yes
Video mode
WiFi	No
GPS	No
USB	micro-USB (USB 3.0)
USB Charging	No
Computing Features
ND Long Exposure	No
Pixel Shift	No
Focus Stacking	No
Startrail/Composite mode	No
Astrotracer	No
Camera body and built
Touchscreen	No
LCD	3.0" pixels, fixed
Viewfinder	Electronic, coverage 100%, 1.09x
Viewfinder resolution	1024 x 768 px
Flash	No
Storage	SD, SDHC, SDXC (UHS-I)
Storage, Slot 2	not available
Shutter	Mechanical
Battery	Sigma BP-61, 14.00 Wh
Weather sealing	No
Weight	625 g
Dimensions	147 x 95 x 91 mm
Buy
Sigma SD Quattro H, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 245000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Alexjei

sent on September 13, 2022

Pros: Foveon Sensor

Cons: High ISO

Opinion: I will be very brief. The sensor is something incredible. And this is enough and advances to understand what we are talking about. If you are looking for the best autofocus in the world, look elsewhere; if the lens is to photograph in low light, it's not for you. But if you try it, you risk falling in love with it because the sharpness of the image is extraordinary. Fairytale black and white.

Maxkawa

sent on December 28, 2020

Pros: Immediacy of the menus, ergonomics and construction, superior materials, image quality, black and white close to that of the film, already good quality of raw b/n developed in the room

Cons: operational slowness, even of the software, objectives that - in some cases - can be too cumbersome and heavy. It's certainly not the machine for all uses

Opinion: After so many second thoughts, I finally decided and replaced the Sony RX1rII (fantastic, beautiful, but with "too hard" and "digital" files for my taste) with this Sigma, attracted as I was by the reviews that talked about a Foveon sensor so close to the film (which I continue to use in the medium format). And, in fact, I have to say that - albeit with only a few shots taken and with software, although simple, still to be understood - the quality seems to me to be there. true colors, analog black and white. Then, it is true that it is not the machine with which to shoot on every occasion, but on this topic there are already many reviews, so there is no point in repeating them; the only thing I would like to add - but it is an opinion referring to my way of photographing - is that already in the many years of Kodachrome 25 and 64 I did not despair for some shot lost for not having in the car a film of 1600 ISO.... With the film it is not that you could change the sensitivity at will and I don't think it was a drama. For the rest, there is perhaps a lack of a fixed objective of human dimensions. I now mainly use the Sigma 30mm f1.4 Art and - although it is not among those suggested for the APC-h sensor - I do not notice any particular problems. I continue the study and the fun...

Notomb

sent on December 10, 2020

Pros: SDQ's own minus the price

Cons: The same as the SDQ no longer exist Aps-H optics

Opinion: The same one I wrote for SDQ but in this case something has to be added. It is identical to the SDQ, an additional item in the menu, self-on-off crop and a small part of the additional sensor. The photos are identical changes the file size. 6200x4152 vs. 5424x3616. In order to take advantage of the extra sensor portion, you need to use DG series FF optics or some for APS-C DC series that almost cover, and I stress almost, the APS-H sensor. the 18-35mm A on the 50-100mm A and 30mm A. the files are fuller and become even slower, both in recovery and development. It costs exactly twice as much, both new and used, is it worth it? Everyone will make their own comments. Incomprehensible that the H has a higher rating than SDQ. As I wrote for SDQ, it costs too little and many have matched us with an old 20-year-old Sigma lens by nullifying it. The H cost twice as much and "forcing" a more suitable purchase of lenses benefited. I preferred to have 2 SDQ bodies.

Nessunego

sent on October 01, 2020

Pros: Ergonomics, image quality, solid construction, available quality optics, fantastic black and white, removable and removable ir filter with ease (2 real seconds). Sigma Photo Pro development software works wonders if you know how to use it and if you have proper hardware. Very well done Tethered Sigma Capture Pro shooting software.

Cons: Single memory slot, no electronic shutter or first electronic curtain

Opinion: To review this camera you must first of all understand what it is built for, otherwise you give bizarre judgments that sound like "this Ferrari is uncomfortable on the dirt road". Intended use: studio photography, landscape photography, architecture photography, product photography, macrophotography, portrait, reproduction of works of art, fashion photography Merits: construction quality, image quality, ease of use. Image quality: natural detail rendering, very high detail, very high color depth (reproduces shades of color that Bayer sensors simply do not see). This results in very three-dimensional images and with very natural tonal passages. The yield is medium format. With this camera my images need very little post production. Black and white: The characteristics of the Foveon sensor allow an unreliable black and white for a Bayer sensor, perhaps the Foveon is only exceeded by the Leica monochrome sensor (do two counts on costs and versatility). Infrared photography: the IR filter is removed (and then reassembled) in a few moments and a special filter in front of the lens is enough to shoot in infrared. Performance af: more than suitable for use, face recognition works well. Battery grip: done well, improves grip and autonomy. Flash compatibility: My godox flashes and Godox transmitter (all for Nikon) work well in manual, no ittl. What I would have liked: dual memory slot (for when not shooting thethered), electronic shutter or first electronic curtain (to eliminate shuttershock risk). It's not for everyone, it's for those who know what they want. To me it changed photography for the better (and photographer for 30 years). This camera really deserves, I invite you to try it for yourself, comparing it to a high-level Bayer sensor camera (I compared it to Nikon D850, 47MP without AA filter: it won the Sigma for image quality). I link to more discursive and complete review: http://forum.foveon.it/index.php?topic=9288.0;topicseen

Saverio Forte

sent on October 12, 2019

Pros: spatial resolution, photographic approach to which it "forces", unique character

Cons: not for everyone, limited usage range for the less-navigated

Opinion: After almost 10 years of Canon I am gradually migrating from the reflex system to the mirrorless one and the Sigma immediately conquered me for 3 motvi: 1 the foveon sensor and more generally the yield to 100 iso 2 slow grafts and reflex batteries 3 solidity , singular appearance and build quality Bonus- the ability to easily remove the infrared filter to experience this type of photography I used this machine for still life and studio portraits and is not comparable to any ff on the market. photos of this quality you can see only with the medium format I also tried a little wedding and reportage and I have to say that it gets away but you see that it is not a machine designed for too dynamic use the real treat is to use it with m42 adapter for still life in the studio with vintage lenses... the sharpness that develops in combination with the 35 mm sgma art catapults you into another dimension!!!

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Sigma SD Quattro H

Sigma sd4H test

by Lo_straniero
43 comments, 11787 views

HI RES 17.0 MP

The shepherd among the "Basse"

by Ometto
35 comments, 1305 views

HI RES 5.8 MP

Angelina

by Maserc
11 comments, 7589 views

Mepomegranate ripped apart

by Lo_straniero
18 comments, 5492 views

HI RES 22.8 MP

Untitled Photo

by Luca Sacchi
27 comments, 3685 views

HI RES 6.4 MP

Velo city 4

by Maserc
32 comments, 5737 views

Civita Bagnoregio

by Fm_photo
40 comments, 8101 views

HI RES 42.7 MP

Velo city 7

by Maserc
40 comments, 7248 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Veronica

by Valerio Tagliabue
14 comments, 1777 views

HI RES 9.2 MP

Velo city 2

by Maserc
38 comments, 3675 views

Veronica

by Valerio Tagliabue
16 comments, 1250 views

HI RES 26.8 MP

The crow

by Maserc
35 comments, 5667 views

Anchovy

by Notomb
9 comments, 2910 views

by Maserc
16 comments, 3363 views

Boh

by Andrea Frassinetti
9 comments, 3334 views

HI RES 8.6 MP

Untitled Photo

by Notomb
16 comments, 776 views

White Sand, New Mexico

by Vinciaru
15 comments, 3049 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Velo city

by Maserc
23 comments, 3338 views

Sarah

by Notomb
5 comments, 1358 views

Nier 2B

by Notomb
10 comments, 1043 views

Velo city 8

by Maserc
26 comments, 4649 views

HI RES 4.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Luca Sacchi
7 comments, 2404 views

HI RES 16.4 MP

Star

by Notomb
7 comments, 2133 views

Untitled Photo

by Valerio Tagliabue
9 comments, 1078 views

HI RES 9.4 MP

Nicole

by Notomb
8 comments, 1164 views

Fiat 500

by Vinciaru
11 comments, 3235 views

HI RES 25.6 MP

Invisible

by Maserc
23 comments, 2939 views

HI RES 17.8 MP

Foveon version

by Notomb
2 comments, 1088 views

Paris Eiffel tower

by Leygrand
8 comments, 2782 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

Simona Calabria 2022

by Notomb
3 comments, 995 views

by Maserc
11 comments, 3265 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Marine

by Notomb
14 comments, 1394 views

Untitled Photo

by Notomb
5 comments, 1756 views

Carcara

by Maserc
26 comments, 3023 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

ELISA

by Notomb
4 comments, 1947 views

Star

by Notomb
9 comments, 642 views

Pin Up

by Notomb
10 comments, 1003 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Sigma » Sigma SD Quattro H

Sigma SD Quattro H : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this camera?

Photos taken with Sigma SD Quattro H