| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
 |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.
 |
Sigma 24-35mm f/2.0 DG HSM Art Pros: The large aperture for those who intend to take photos with low light, sharp, very sharp and robust, very robust Cons: Huge, limited range, distortion and vignetting, it's not this miracle of a lens that those who spent money on it want to make seem Opinion: Used yesterday for a shooting in very very tight spaces, almost always near f8, certainly very sharp, versatility I do not pronounce, I had with me the 24-120S that could do the same things with a more reliable AF on a Z8 but the Sigma did its dirty job and also well but every shot must be corrected for distortions, You will say that it is not a serious damage since a click is enough but then we do not say that it is the lens of miracles, sorry, the lens of miracles. If even with the aperture closed it needs to be corrected then I don't know how much such an aperture is worth on that focal range but my opinion makes little text since up to 50mm I just can't like anything but when needed you try and the Sigma certainly does well, I don't have other lenses to compare it to but if I had to carry it with me only for casual shots no, too heavy, if I liked the focal length I would prefer a lighter fixed that gives less attention even giving up half a stop of light. If you like the range, definitely a good purchase at the prices you find today, a little more time in post production and you pay for yourself. sent on 03 Maggio 2026 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
