|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Cesarealdo57 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Cesarealdo57  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M1 II Pros: Weight, performance, staggering speed, apparent solidity from the first contact. Cons: Menu not really intuitivissimi.. You need to get used to a little.. And it takes at least a second (and also a third..) Battery, for a whole day passed out, maybe with the cold. At the time.. I can't find anything else. Opinion: Got set together at 12/40 and 40/150serie PR0 both f 2.8. (Absolutely exceptional, especially the second), after months of hesitation and mistrust for the transition from Nikon FF, after the opinions of friends professional photographers, after reading any technical sheet and testing a day.. I decided. Consider the results in all conditions, and comparing the files with the FF.. I can synthesize like this: a) I don't regret my cameras at all, and their weight! b) Don't worry about the Micro4/3.. The algorithm with which it was designed, compensates for all the hypothetical deficiencies compared to a FF, from the texture to the chromatic scale. Shots compared, Croppando to 200% (insane..), wanting to be fussy, you can notice small differences.. But you should print posters of 3 meters x 2.. c) But why didn't I take it before? D) my (old) back.. Thank you very very. sent on May 22, 2018 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilizer very good, excellent sharpness up to 200 and with f 8, price, weight. Cons: After 200 you "take home" the shot .. in the raw something gets recovered.If not a lightning strike, especially the semibuio Opinion: Use on FF.rnsono passed from a 70/200 vr f2.8 Nikon to this ... (performing, yes, but very heavy). I thought I was disappointed .. beh ... that's not it. RnBut the two optics are not comparable, from the point of view of yield, since I do not use it more for work, but sporadically as a cameraman, I consider it a very successful one Object.Nightly lightweight, lightweight (less than half of the nikon) ... it costs 1/6 but there is absolutely no proportion in the yield! Stabilization surprised me. I took the free nightbreaks with closed diaphragms And passionately long times, and looking at the home photographic monitor, I was contented.Col stand, diaphragm 11 at night, outline of palaces, lit, clear, with nice "stars" due to the diaphragm ... rnIn the light, Of course, no problem. In the past, I also had the stabilized Nikon 70/300 ... I think it is lower than the Tamron, especially in stabilization. I recommend it to anyone who is not going to print poster ... and want to spend a little. sent on July 12, 2017 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Pros: Sharpness, color rendering, price Cons: Vignette a bit, but easy to fix in pp Opinion: I had to replace the 24/70 f 2.8 Nikon, because it was stolen. Not being able to recompile it, listening to friends' opinions, I took this, somewhat skeptical (towards Tamron in general) .. rnUnexpected surprise. Found in low light conditions, , Nocturnal, concerts .. I can only say that I did not regret the equivalent Nikon.Ho printed 40x60 with a yield, color and sharpness, according to me at least the same.Use on FF.Probably I should work, and print more in Great, distortion is noticeable, but for use by an advanced cameraman, it goes well. And comparing shots and Nikon prints, I can swear that there are not all Euros of difference with Nikon. It's half, but, proportionally, As rendered, is worth less. Lightweight vignetting at the minimum focal point, but easily corrected in pp.Conscious even to skeptics. sent on July 07, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
