|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vnczo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vnczo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 17-35mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Toughness, nice to see, compact Cons: Soft edges at full opening. Vignetting. Opinion: Beautiful object that has its years but that can still take great photos. If it is around 300 euros in good condition makes sense appropriate. If not it is absolutely best to go on something newer. I from 2.8 to 3.5 found it almost unusable as much as it kneads the details and as far as vignette, so at that point it was so much worth having a wide F4. For astrophotography with MAF at infinity instead everything OK. sent on June 13, 2018 |
 | Leica D-LUX 3 Pros: Pocketabilissima, Beautiful beautiful Bella, AF, invisibility, stabilized sensor Cons: Noise, Manual focus, on-camera controls Opinion: Even when she left, it was probably a performance bomb. But its beauty sold out of proportion, even with an initial cost greater than €600. It's in his pocket, with his little peck on the lens. In less than 4 seconds comes on, the lens unrolls, focuses and snaps. AF surprisingly quick. It has so many creative features that for the 2006 you wouldn't have expected. B/N, Sepia, Portrait, etc... Pretty useless things but they come well. The sensor is small. The off-plan doesn't look for him who knows how much with a street compact. Can still give satisfaction in the street. The AF with center point catches well, and something takes you home. The stabilized sensor can get you down to 1/60s. The built-in Flash is just nice to extract. Then you can put it back in. Without going through the menu you can choose only if you take the tram or go on foot, but it was not born to be set on the fly by advanced users. And in fact the programmed function works wonders. So much noise, and the few megapixels allow minimal crop. On the other hand you can shoot in RAW and save yourself in corner football. The manual focus is bad, that is the ring of the lens is welded and you can only choose from the menu at which distance to focus (from 10-20 CM for macro to infinity, with step at 50cm, 1m, 2m, 5m). sent on June 01, 2018 |
 | Nikon Coolpix A Pros: Robustness, ignition time, invisibility, fixed lens 28mm Cons: Rarity (no longer on the market) Opinion: A tank to always keep in your pocket. Extract, light and focus with one hand in less than 3 seconds. Up to ISO 640 very little noise; Excellent image quality (thanks to the fixed 28mm lens and the APS-C sensor). RAW files are good quality and easily manipulated. JPEGs are more than good for those who do little post-production and never print more than 20x30 at medium to high resolutions. If at 90% you take street and landscaping, it will slowly increase the days when you leave everything at home and only go out with her in the backpack. The reflex will be a distant memory of the amateur photographer, especially when you realize that a retracted to 28mm f2.8 with STA compact gives acceptable bokeh. If you are an experienced or coveted user, the speech obviously changes. And especially if you need to zoom, stay away from the 28mm. The crop will not save you. In a lot of light situations, the 1/2000s constraint of shutter is a bit tedious, but taking ISO 100 and F > 5 you hardly ever have any problems. Walking among the people the Black version is a ghost, a few more problems with the silver version that looks like a silver jewel. I had it and resolute it after a few months. The B/N setting is a very remarkable fetish for lazy lovers of a certain kind of street. There's also a phantomatic MACRO focus that works so-so. But it works. A real gem that Nikon has brought out on the market with a few years ahead of the Street fashion that has now invaded our cities. And outgoing the price was disproportionate. From there the total failure and withdrawal from the market. It follows that it is now a rare piece. So if you have it do not sell it and if you are curious take it. 90% of my street photos are taken with Coolpix A. sent on April 11, 2018 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Sharpness, colors, high jpeg Cons: Given the price of the used, no one Opinion: There is little to do, it seems to me a jewel. There is no tropicalization and dust is always lurking, but if you use this reflex with some satisfaction. Combined with good optics, it delivers incredible color files, where post production is minimal. Used with AF on the central point I think looks great. Currently not making videos I do not feel the need to disown it, and I'm sure those who buy a 500 level entry level when about a 300 € home brings a 5D is making a big mistake. sent on July 13, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
