|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
88simo www.juzaphoto.com/p/88simo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic GX9 Pros: Light, compact, solid, practical, price of another product range, dynamic black and white, excellent autofocus Cons: Sometimes little "hospitable" sights... Opinion: I start with a very narrow consideration, that is worth every euro required for its purchase, perhaps more. Used cold, without time to know her to set me to set her the day after arrival, without the possibility of appeal, only JPEG by machine and never betrayed me using it in manual, the mistakes were mine. After setting up the car with the real-time preview as for my A77 everything became very familiar to me, but even before it was just a matter of getting back to using the display well, and even there the highlighted range for times/diaphragms helps you, making the exposure to a jerk-proof. Precise and rapid focus even without an illuminator even in indecent light conditions (the cards in the game were difficult to read, but she worked without particular hesitation, even with a zoom and not with a bright fixed). The position of the hand is very different from that of a mid-range reflex, much less comfortable, but the counterbalance for better ergonomics is a significantly higher weight! In my case the GX9 with 12-60 weighs less than the body of my SLT, so it followed me all day without ever leaving me, the reflex would stay at home to safeguard the neck... I was on vacation, not at work, if bringing the car is a boredom, where ends the pleasure of the hobby? The battery drains at a rapid pace, but she survived a morning in Pompeii under concentant sun, re-embroidered with powerbank at lunch, used on a trip to Vesuvius again under the scorching sun, then in the evening to photograph the stars with 60' exposures... I think you can say he does his dirty work! The only sore note is the viewfinder not always up to the rest of the machine, especially if a little light penetrates the eye, the vision is faded and tarnished. As for responsiveness if you don't put the preview in real time, it's spectacular, as it is for the whole machine in general! The diplay is really great, the touch makes it almost too easy to choose the focus point, I would say it causes very strong addiction! The sound of the shot is pleasant, you hear the mechanical shutter snapping with a light and dull tap, it is nice to hear the "physical" response to the pressure. The sensor works egregiously even in low lights, as long as it exposes correctly, but it does a job comparable to my APSC of a few years, but with dim zoom, I want to try to see what can give me with a 15mm leica mounted! Don't forget the dynamic black and white... Beautiful... the photos come out of the car and ask to be printed and I swear it was time that it didn't happen to me! The COLOR rendering of JPEG is also beautiful, the files are rich in detail, almost sharp and with a zoom. I don't think I can ask for more, then I print in A4, I don't look at the photos on 100% monitors, that I leave to the pixel fetishists. I don't think I'd recommend it for videos, but for those who only take photos I would say that it is the machine to go back to having fun lightly, without giving up anything in particular, except to be seen with 1000 or 2000 euros with pitiful zoomed and used cars (I have seen too many of these crap in a week of vacation). It will remain by your side, with a couple of compact zooms you can cover an absurd range, if you love the fixtures then I think it is absolute perfection. It will make you regret only the time you have not spent with her before (for the sights to me personally does not bother me too much, I just need to compose, focus is still easy, it does not seem even fair to ask for more for its price range, we are talking about a price lower than the entry level reflex, but with an overall quality well beyond that price range! If the viewfinder will make it more beautiful in its evolution... it will mean that I will take a sister from her) sent on August 22, 2020 |
 | Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: Price Cons: Slow AF, poor mechanics, the collapse of clarity over 130mm Opinion: All in all a good lens to start or if you take a little to long focal lengths, although sharpness is pretty poor, but the mechanical is really bad, after only six months or less and less than 3000 shots of the gear Focus has broken out of the blue, without ever having taken a shot nor have done work under minimal proibitive.rnDa after the repair I did not understand if you suffer from back or front focus and sharpness is expired further! rnNon sure it worthwhile to spend a little to begin with this lens if you realize after a while that if you want to progress, even slightly, you need to change and add another spending more consistent ... perhaps it's better to start from a perspective little 'less "base", perhaps you spend less by making a single purchase of a good standard! sent on January 31, 2013 |
 | Sony DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM Pros: Sharpness, color and contrast Cons: AF noisy attack plastic, dim, gum bleaching after you use a little 'intense, there is no real manual focus ring Opinion: To read the pros and cons so you would want to throw just got the car, but it is quite the opposite! RnSono impressed many times by the detail of the images obtained with this ultra-lightweight plastic barrel! More than once I thought I'd replace it in favor of optical ultra light fixed, but I had to change his mind, no matter how noisy in focus and everything is plastic, with a good flash becomes monstrous! RnCon the flash unit and the ' illuminated active infrared does not miss more than one step in really bad light, autofocus becomes a missile and a sniper, then the flash makes up for the little luminosità.rnPer regarding the brightness is useless to hope to use it without flash indoors, but this even with the zoom 2.8 unless you have a car for use over ISO 800 for shooting inside without lifting above ISO 400 is necessary to resort to fixed ultra luminosi.rnIl noise micro motor focus for me is not a problem, so I with the camera take pictures and video and it is not un'obiettivo to use for hunting Photographic, therefore is completely irrelevant! rnL'attacco is plastic, but the mechanical never betrays, in contrast to the optical sigma also of excellence! It will also be plastic, but I have no doubt about the quality and if bleaching the rubber zoom ring is not a problem, the lens works the same! RnForse a little 'more brightness would not have failed, but for 90 euro I saw her hard! rnSe you are really hard up before taking another brighter lens from one of the brands Universal I recommend you try to squeeze it, perhaps with an external flash (not the internal illuminator, with what is a catastrophe, but the problem is the flash ) and rewards come! rnL'unico zoom lens replacement (I speak for the APS-C) that would put the SAM 18-55 in the drawer is the 16-50 f2.8 sony that I could try a little, but the prices are not even comparable! sent on January 26, 2013 |
| Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: Price Cons: Slow AF, poor mechanics, the collapse of clarity over 130mm Opinion: A lens after all good to start with, although sharpness is pretty poor, but the mechanical is really bad, after only six months or less and less than 3000 shots gear focusing broke point white, without ever having taken a shot nor have done work under minimal prohibitive, I hope now assisting sigma.Da after the repair I did not understand if you suffer from back or front focus and sharpness is expired further! Non I'm sure it's worth spending a little to start with this lens if you realize after a while that if you want to progress, even slightly, you need to change and add another spending more consistent ... perhaps it's better to start from a 'perspective a little' less 'base', forsand you spend less by making a single purchase of a good standard! sent on July 02, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
