|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marco La Rosa www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarcoLaRosa  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S Pros: size and weight, optical qualities. Cons: to name one, the only fact that on the hood it has a small slot that in long exposures can be subject to light infiltration. Opinion: His for a couple of months and I must say that compared to his older brother for SLR has improved in everything. Weight and dimensions with the front lens no longer protruding, flare resistance to the condition that at night you use its hood to avoid the flares of street lamps for example. Excellent sharpness and very controlled distortion make this lens a MUST HAVE for Nikon ML owners. the price I do not find excessive. Possibility to mount filters more comfortable and slightly cheaper than the 14-24 v2.8 G. Rating 10 without reservations sent on February 20, 2022 |
 | Nikon Z6 II Pros: Balance features, white balance, very customizable, excellent iso seal. Cons: for its cost none. Opinion: More than 10 years of Nikon equipment I can say that the z6II is the right balance in everything.. in my opinion it does not excel in anything .. but with a good handle and valuable optics you take home shots of all respect .. used for a couple of jobs such as wedding and events in general.. the car does not disappoint, indeed flanked by my old D850 I did not miss a shot .. this machine managed to make me make the breakthrough and switch to ML by selling the SLR and the 70-200 FL that I will change soon with the S version ... excellent machine for those who want to afficinarsi in the ML world of Nikon. the only flaw for me is the presence of the low-pass filter ... the file is not very sharp as sharpness sent on February 19, 2022 |
 | Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 Pros: Sharpness, bokeh, construction, microcontrast and colors. Cons: weight, focus ring a little wide, is addictive to wanting to use only zeiss lenses Opinion: Optics with unbeatable performance for colors, sharpness and focus ... all with an impeccable construction ... the price to pay is only in the fact that it is a lens more oriented to the advanced amateur photographer and less to professionals of ceremonies in general .. at least do some work with a certain calm ... I mounted it on my d800 and with the slide dk 17 I can focus more easily than before .. coupled with a zoom type 70-200 you live peacefully with the maximum of opportunity to bring home any type of shooting from the supreme yield .. sent on January 10, 2018 |
 | Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 Pros: Construction, ring focus, bokeh Cons: nothing to report. Opinion: Excellent lens. a little expensive but when you start to use it you forget the price ... great bokeh and crystal clear already the maximum aperture difficult to detach it from my Nikon D800. rnConfrontando other macro lenses in its class, we realize that it lacks the stabilizer (such as other zeiss optics of course), but the maximum aperture F2 pays as well as the lack of AF in exchange you have a nut and buttery to the touch after sensational ... the nikkor 200mm f2 this is the best lens I used. sent on November 06, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8 G ED Pros: Construction, fast AF, sharpness, contrast. Cons: Care must be taken to the front lens protruding, Flare. Opinion: I have the best optics, fast, sharp and high-contrast. Such as flaw add the inability to add filters (except Lee) but has his quest optical polarizer a sort of inside! So to speak, of course, however, because of the price board especially for landscape photographers and those who love photos that artistic. DX also does very well. sent on August 15, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
