|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Wilcoyote www.juzaphoto.com/p/Wilcoyote  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: economical, light, all-rounder, good value for money (since it is at 200 Euro new), made discrete to TA, at least to the minor focal. Cons: Sharp loss of sharpness at the edges and, at 70 mm, across the frame, automatic MAF sometimes inaccurate. Opinion: It was bundled with the A7 II, at the moment is the only optics I have that allows all the automatisms, absolute allows to take pictures dignified but, comparing the results obtained with this and those obtained with the old lenses Rollei qbm (most of which Zeiss), The comparison is Mercileful. I snapped three sets of images at 28, 35, 50 and 70 mm with aperture 5.6, 11 and 16, with this and with the old zoom Rolleinar MC 28-80 f = 3.5-4.5; The first thing that catches the eye is that the old zoom at the edges is infinitely sharper than the sony, in the center in some conditions the Sony looks like a better skin, but it could also depend on the imperfect MAF with the old (the system of help of the manual MAF with The analogue lenses do not allow to enlarge the image on the screen, so you have to use focus peaking, which is far from accurate); At 50 and even more at 70 mm instead the old is clearly superior to the NEW. Comparing the result between the zoom Sony at 35 mm and the very old Distagon 35 mm f = 2.8, The old far exceeds the new, but very much! Unfortunately zooms and modern fixes with comparable quality cost an eye of the Head. sent on October 14, 2018 |
 | Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20mm f/2.8 Pros: Exceptional lens, very distorted, little light falling to the edges, sharp. Last but not least, M42 screw adapters cost very little and are good. Cons: If we really want, the impossibility of using all the digital camera cameras. Pretty complicated to repair, if needed (sooner or later you will need to clean the diaphragm blades, do not run away, unfortunately). Opinion: A lens you can no longer do when you buy it. Even second-hand is not economical, but you will soon notice superior quality both in the lens itself and in the results it can achieve. It offers excellent sharpness across the framed field and almost three-dimensional spatiality, color rendering is very well balanced. Anti-reflection treatment is good for the time when it was produced but absolutely not very excellent, so when shooting it is necessary to use the appropriate methods to avoid unwanted reflexes and unwanted hairs. sent on August 24, 2017 |
 | Sony NEX-5N Pros: Cons: Opinion: Also the panoramic shot, which can be set from menus for each panning sense (up, down, right, left). This imposition is not immediate because of the "user friendly" menu. RnPur having big hands I did not even have any problems in prolonged use, which many complain. It is a question of personal adaptability and habits. The photos are of the highest quality, totally indistinguishable from those taken with a much more bulky (and expensive) Nikon D7000 (they seem to have the same sensor), even mounting optics of particular value (type The Zeiss Distagon 35 mm f = 1: 1.4 or the Zeiss Jena Flektogon 20 mm f = 1: 2.8) the pictures are also better than those taken with expensive Nikon optics (not that the Zeiss paid them little to ' Age!). Rn So if you have a vintage optical drive that you would like to rip, a Sony Nex is the best choice. Models like the 5n, although valid, have now ridiculous prices, then take the adapters d sent on July 31, 2017 |
 | Panasonic Lumix TZ10 / ZS7 Pros: Versatile, excellent quality of the images in relation to the size of the sensor, possibility of adjustment equal to those of an SLR, although in a more narrow range of values, excellent stabilization system. Cons: A bit 'large, is not in his trouser pocket but in that of the jacket, poor quality images at a focal maximum, unclear display in strong ambient light conditions, battery of limited duration. Opinion: Although the car now rather dated (today 3 April 2017, purchased in 2012) I find it still very valid, if in good condition so it is one of acqusti worth considering if you want to spend the minimum on a compact usata.rnLa sharpness it is good to excellent except in the longer focal lengths where, in addition to the probable ineffectiveness of the stabilization system (effective in focal short, medium, up to 100-120 mm), comes in the inevitable decay due to the optic, but Leica still economica.rnDi not always adequate utility also the "landscape" function: it does not allow continuous shooting as in newer cameras and does not automatically merges the frames: after setting the direction of sliding, to each individual shot shows in transparency about 1/4 of the previous frame, so as to allow the alignment of the frames for the entire panorama. In conditions of high brightness, however, this function is practically inutile, given the low display readability in these environments. In all other cases the photo quality is very high, so as to allow excellent enlargements even up to A3 size. rnUna peculiarity is perhaps due to a malfunctioning of my camera is the poor battery life: I noticed that you download quickly even off camera. So in addition to always bring a spare pair when I put her out of the car dall'alloggiamento.rnSe the battery life GPS is activated decreases ulteriormente.rnNonostante this, the positives significantly outweigh the negative: excellent image quality and the great flexibility of use, practically equal to that of an SLR in non-extreme conditions, make it the ideal companion to the discerning photographer would like to always have, and in fact I take her almost always appresso.rn sent on April 03, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
