|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Thespinnaker66Rob www.juzaphoto.com/p/Thespinnaker66Rob  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Yongnuo YN 35mm f/2 Pros: Price, weight, sometimes very good, but only at times. Cons: Noisy AF, unacceptable CT sharpness, MAF that requires a fine fine adjustment (+12), sharpness at edges often very very poor.rnNice optics game inside the helical groove where it flows when focus that sometimes causes heavy misalignments of the lenses with consequent strong blurring of the edges and chromatic aberrations. Incontinuous performance, it passes from results of surprising quality to results to be trashed. Opinion: Honestly, apart from the weight and price, I do not find anything positive in this view.rnIn the meantime it needs a strong auto-focus compensation (+12) (CANON EOS 6D mark 1) .rn Maybe it's my sample, but I find it unusable at TA because of the lack of sharpness and chromatic aberration, things improve from f4 onwards, but it always remains a sharpness at the edges often unacceptable.rnSi then occur strange facts, for example in a landscape photo with more or less MIM to infinity and diaphragm 5.6 a subject close enough on the right side extreme results in focus, while one left almost to infinity (and therefore close to the MAF) is blurred and affected by heavy chromatic aberration, distortion and obfuscation, while the center remains quite clear and well inciso.rnA my opinion is a defect of assembly or construction in my sample that denotes a poor control post production.rnIn particular I think it is due to a considerable game of the inside of the the optic inside the helical groove along which it flows through effectuse the MAF which sometimes causes heavy misalignments of the lenses resulting in a strong blurring of the edges and unacceptable chromatic aberration situations.rnEffettuerò certainly return, however for now the judgment is extremely negative despite the very affordable price.rnNon recommend it because its use respect at a zoom should be justified by a greater clarity and consistency of result and greater brightness offered, considering that the results to f2 - f2.8 are almost always unacceptable, I really do not understand the purpose at least on FF. sent on March 19, 2018 |
 | Canon 5D Pros: Outstanding incarnation yield. Simple but complete menu in the essential canonical functions. "Rocky" body. 8000th. Few frills a lot of substance, excellent exposure meter. Cons: Few autofocus points. Reduced ISO sensitivity. Display poorly defined and with very approximate colors. Lack of automatic sensor cleaning and AF end regulation. Opinion: Great machine.rnI also a 6D that I appreciate very much, but the old 5D are in love! RnHa rock solidity, a simple but complete menu for those that are the classic functions of photography, an essentiality that fascinates me along with its wonderful sensor dense which makes the colors pasty and in particular gives the best of itself in the portraits where even in my opinion is unreachable.rnEvery time I shoot with my 5D and watch the shot to the PC I am surprised because it never disappoints me, it is almost tenderness to see that excellent files can still produce this old woman. She's an old professional and you see! I'll never sell it, I hope the shutter will last for a long time; would I recommend it? Absolutely yes! rnHe obviously the limitations due to the time, but with the price to which su finds today also in my opinion represents an excellent door to the full frame. sent on February 10, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
