Reviews written by Vincenzopernisco

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Vincenzopernisco
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vincenzopernisco

PROFILE

ALL PHOTOS

GALLERIES

Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Vincenzopernisco

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

Canon 1Ds Mark III

Pros: It's a massive, indestructible series 1. Reliable machine that produces rare beauty files.

Cons: It does not hold the technological comparison with the latest machine bodies. Iso itd.

Opinion: It is a dated car body that lacks all the "agevolations" of modern reflexes. It is essential and therefore easy to use in various types of photography without getting lost between different menus and frets. The burst is not very fast so, as is well known, perhaps the least suitable kind is the sporty photo and the like. Moreover, it is a machine created for use in the studio. It's a room that requires precise choices about what you want to do. It needs bright and high-quality optics because it is unsurpassed (even with respect to the latest ones) for the image quality that, besides the more than satisfactory 21mpx definition, has a rare (almost analog) heat to be found in the sensors latest. This quality is lost exponentially by increasing the speed (ISO) of the sensor so it is always advisable to work with very low values ??(<800 ISO). This forces you to cuAll aspects of image production (optical quality, light, time / diaphragm ratio, etc.) are often rare, which often the rooms of recent times allow you to neglect thanks to the technology. Having also owned various 5d (mark II, mark III), I can say that the 1Ds mark III has a "charm" in the images (which is accentuated in print) unreachable. That's why I chose this body. The display is unresolved but allows you to have a good draft of focus, composition, and so on. And the end result can only be seen on screen and even more in print, as already mentioned. For the rest, it's a series 1. I do not really like cameras business and I think a good photo produced 10 years ago is still a good photo today as well. The 1Ds mkIII goes to and therefore reflects my workflow without rinsing the mouth of technicalities and false myths made by Megapixels, Iso stellar and ridiculous frame rates on the practical level.

sent on May 15, 2017