|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nrk www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nrk  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Minolta MD Rokkor 50mm f/1.7 Pros: Good clarity from f2.8 which is great at f5.6, very nice color rendition, great construction quality, lightweight and compact, low prices also for specimens in excellent condition. Cons: Low flare resistance, longitudinal chromatic aberrations evident in strong contrast areas especially at TA and f2.8, it would be interesting to have an intermediate shot between f1.7 and f2.8 for the diaphragm ring. Opinion: It was my first vintage optics too because you can find immaculate specimens at a few tens of euros, currently using it on a Sony A6000 (dense APS-C sensor) with dumb adapter making it a good mid-canvas for capable portraits to produce nice images especially for the best color rendering. This lens has a double character: when used in TA, although it does not lack resolution capability in the strict sense, it produces significantly "skinned" and reduced contrast images but this feature can be remarkably appreciated under certain circumstances, but already closing the diaphragm at f2. 8 the effect disappears and the contrast increases visibly to reach the maximum at f5.6 so that it can be used without any problems even for landscapes or shots that generally require sharpness. On APS-C, the edges are very good thanks to the reduced image circle. The bokeh is generally soft and pleasant, except in certain circumstances as branches or leaves placed in the background only at certain distances fromsubject. Out of focus light points are beautiful round when snaps to TA, but yield changes as soon as the diaphragm closes, showing an obvious hexagonal shape due to the same diaphragm consisting of 6 unrounded lamellae. Distortion so low to go unnoticed, you can safely do without corrections. Even with adapter the lens remains compact enough on the Sony MLC bodies and is light relative to its construction, so it's enjoyable to use. My specimen has a fluid focus ring that is good but not overwhelming. It may not be as distinct as other vintage lenses, but it is better suited to a more varied use and can be exploited more frequently. sent on October 27, 2017 |
 | Sony RX100 Pros: Great 1 "sensor with good dynamic range, very versatile focal length (28-100mm on a 35mm base), wide-angle, so small to stay in the pants pocket, many advanced features for a compact (incredible in years when it's Exit). Cons: The side of the screen is light, at the maximum focal length the lens resolution is visibly lower, AF in low light, maximum speed 1/2000, with the passage of time can "suck" dust from the collapsible optic. Opinion: I have it since 2013, he has accompanied me on many trips around the world and will continue to do so as backup as small as it is. I'm especially fond of it because in a short time it has led me to appreciate photography though amateur and I would never have said it when I bought it. The focal length makes it truly versatile even if the side of the canvas suffers both for brightness and definition, the most successful part is definitely that wide-angle side. In the center is very sharp and solved already at TA especially on the wide angle but sharpness at the edges is not the best, in terms of uniformity across the frame returns the best results at f5.6 and can be closed without any special problems up to f8 , but after the effects of diffraction begin to become apparent. The maximum speed of the shutter (only 1/2000) occasionally gave me some skyscraper, but more generally I solved with a magnetic filter ring that allowed me to use aND filter if needed and most often a CLP. The JPEG files produced by the camera are disappointing even by playing with the settings, but working on RAWs can yield remarkable results thanks to the excellent dynamic range of the sensor in relation to its size (and was not BSI yet!). The resolution of 20mpx allows you to have a bit of margin to croak without too much mood. The AF in favorable light conditions is fine, but as soon as the light is short, it starts to work hard and go hunting. Manual focusing is possible and generally works fine with focus and magnification, at least within the limits of the fact that it can only be operated from the LCD screen. The only one found in all these years, maybe because I used it really so much so that at some point I found myself with a black spot particularly noticeable on the sensor, dust presumably coming from the collapsible optic. Turning on the internet I discovered I was not the only one to get in this problema and so I armed myself with patience, I unplugged the camera (not interfering with the operation), I cleaned the sensor and ... set up! I hope that in later versions have been remedied as much as possible to this problem, because spending 1000 € for current models and getting back after a couple of years out of warranty with the sensor dust in a basically armored body is not for nothing sympathetic.rnrnTotal added was a phenomenal compact camera when it came out and defends it well today, although it has now been largely overcome in almost everything by the RX100 after the mk3 but cost so much. The current price, even on the new one, still makes it very appetizing in my opinion. sent on October 24, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
