|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Luca7766 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Luca7766  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Mir-1b 37mm f/2.8 Pros: Good construction, light weight Cons: Little sharpness under F4 Opinion: I bought this lens enticed by the comments more than positive but frankly I expected more also because for the same figure you can take a HELIOS44M, which I have, and that is another world. It returns beautiful colors but I thought much better about bokeh. At the double dial you get used to it, but I thought he had a better deadlift than the picture I give him enough. sent on January 22, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/2 R Pros: compactness, focal length suitable for Street, price Cons: Very questionable quality of files Opinion: Bought, tried and resold after 2 months. I came from x100s and I wanted to widen a little ' the vision with this 18.... I do not know if it is L paired with a 24 sensor that has my xt20 but frankly a step backwards as to details, especially to the notorious edges. I just went to 27... Another story, I've basically recreated the feeling of the x100. So much quality... all over the file. Try to Believe sent on June 01, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 Pros: compactness, quality of files, price. Cons: For now nothing Opinion: I use it by very little but I have to say that I found a high quality especially compared to the 18 that I bought and resold after a month. Excellent quality also at TA., but excels from 5.6. I do mostly Street, I come from x100s and I think with the xt20 I have got a nice couple.. I was hesitant on the focal by 41mm but frankly it doesn't differ much in 35 of the 100. I think it is a lens for those who want especially compactness, portability with a good quality. Do not compare it please at 35 1.4..... Other focal, other quality, other weight, other encumbrance. I confirm the ridiculous cap. The solution adopted for the 100 series is the best in my opinion. sent on May 30, 2018 |
 | Fujifilm X100s Pros: Virtually everything ... focal length, construction, quality of the files. Cons: I can not think of anything. Opinion: What about the .... I finally bought it after a couple of years (!!!) of study. Photographer for years, started with the analogue to activate a ff ... D700. I had the need to "dump me" from space and weight, but, above all, from monkeys to constantly change perspective (I love the fixed). 35 mm is my focal par excellence and after a bit of hesitation and fear of not being able more to change lenses (monkey) I decided to try to take this meraviglua technology. GNI aspect that surprised me more than any other was the final jpeg fully usable immediately ... in terms of, wb, but also of fire. rnCredo that those who switch to mirrorless generally do not want to abandon ff, but alongside a much more versatile tool with a quality that provides a close fit to theoretically with performing systems. rnForse the only flaw, but just to get the hair in the egg, it is the lack of iso ring maybe instead of the ev. As for the battery life does not last ..... certainly like lithium a ff, but rest assured that lasts half a day there...and then c is always the second in his pocket. rnConsiglio strongly the 100s (t, f) to those who, like me loves the street and reportage ... it's funny, you will rediscover the pleasure of photographing without realizing of her neck. Good light! rn sent on January 16, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
