|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Dress www.juzaphoto.com/p/Dress  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro Pros: focal excursion, price, sharpness at short focal length, AF. Cons: strong chromatic aberrations above 200mm, not very bright. Opinion: I state that this is my first goal after 18-55 from kit canon, so the review that I will be compared to the latter.rnavevo fear of buying it having read conflicting reviews on this goal, but at the end for an offer found I bought it shortly with the premise that if I had not satisfied I would give it back.rnallora in sharpness up to 150 mm is great, I pulled out beautiful shots especially at 16mm, unfortunately the more you go up more shows its limits, above the 200mm above all I realized strong chromatic aberrations, which in any case are corrected quickly in post.rnl'AF I found it better than that of 18-55, where I had problems.rnè a goal not to be used at closed, where it is very affected by the fact that it is so dark, but outside there are no problems, and excellent results.rnconclusion: to learn is a great goal, gives you the opportunity with not too much money to understand which focal lengths they are for you and sfruttthe more (I for example I am realizing that 80% of the photos between 16 and 60mm shots) is also valid as a goal and you can make great photos.rn I regretted having bought it, obviously it is a goal only to learn or for the light trips, for those looking for the real quality I discourage.rnrnps. not having the stm have the opportunity to correct the autofocus while shooting was a turn.rn sent on January 07, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
