|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alf22 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alf22  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony DT 35mm f/1.8 SAM Pros: Price, bright, sharpness at full opening, small and convenient Cons: of fragility and plasticky Feeling Opinion: First hard for my Sony A58. I was undecided whether to buy this or 50mm, but being on Aps-c do not regret the choice. Still used in interior for its 54mm equivalent focal length, it shows how hard useful to learn how to handle basic rules of photography. In manual mode it allows you to take anything and everything. From portraits at F1.8 with PDC very small, even in landscapes not too wide, where stopping down at the right point, it returns a incredibile.rnDa sharpness when I bought it I put aside the standard 18-55 kit that still offers a variable focal but it is preferable to use his feet, for a quality absolutely migliore.rnPochissime chromatic aberrations at full aperture, however, disappear closing already af 2.8, which overall makes the TOP. They however also to the total opening, any aberrations are easily solvable in PP. The focus is sometimes a little dancer, and can depend on the camera body, or the photographer not good at rifocheggiare but nothing special. In my case, I found a back focus, and I had to send optica and camera body in support for calibration. With a camera body with fine adjustment of AF, you can set it to avoid "wasters" expeditions, but even here it is not a "defect" in sè.rnIl target price? 200 Euros. Li is worth all, also held in the hand like a tennis ball, and makes a nice, carry around the camera body with this objective piccolo.rnUnico neo? The various components of the feeling of plasticosità that "move", but the feelings are not a problema.rnAssolutamente to have in your corredo.rn sent on March 27, 2017 |
 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Pros: value (any counter is "justified"), zoom range, good for beginners low budget, with post production you get decent pictures. Cons: chromatic aberrations, making slow and noisy fire, decent sharpness only Aperture closed Opinion: We start from the price. 120 Euros or so for a 70-300mm 4 / 5.6 f, in photography are nothing, so any positive note you can draw out of this objective is definitely a point in its favor since the sore is prezzo.rnNota figure out what you can pull out of this lens. Not being stabilized, certainly it is "indicated" for camera bodies stabilized type sony, conversely the construction defects are amplified on non stabilizzati.rnDifetti main bodies are the focus, quite slow, so it is recommended for moving subjects study best settings and take time and burst in the "hope" that a good photo comes out. Present mostly chromatic aberrations at wide apertures, f8 up tend to disappear, but also a pleasant any "fuzzy" (however easily removed in post production when not excessive). The sharpness is what is, TA la.morbidezza is ensured, to 7.1 f, when there is good illumination improve cose.rnÈ a lens that surely must "study" to bring out the best, and that under certain conditions, "limps" type low light. Certainly better than the big brother that costs less than three times, however, for 120 Euros, with a little patience and post production sets they can come up photos "decent" that sometimes are similar to those made with less economic objectives. He recommended to amateurs with little money and few pretensions. sent on February 14, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
