|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Bececcomanuelo www.juzaphoto.com/p/Bececcomanuelo  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Mavic Air 2 Pros: Used camera at 12 mpx, flight duration, flight height, flight distance, flight stability and ghimbal, raw panoramas, 4K 60 fps video side, 4K hdr , d-cinelike , hipelrlapse 8k beautiful with the possibility of varying the to 4K to 1280. Cons: 48 mpx at least in my specimen not very sharp indeed as if it were resampled, 4K zoom 2x not usable but not even 1x at least for me . Opinion: I am very satisfied with this dji product, but I was a little disappointed with some features, for example the 48 mpx praised by dji, which in my opinion are not very usable because the image is not sharp indeed kneaded, as if the Images were superimposed and were not well joined. The 4kzoom in my opinion unusable. The videos are great using the 4kwide are very smooth and especially the dynamic range is impressive in both photos and video. I really like raw panoramas, my favorite is wide angle. The batteries have a real duration of 20 minutes which is not a little , the amazing thing is the hold of the signal I arrived at 500 mi in height and 3 km but I passed 2 mountains in front of me in front of me free field you can really get to 6lm, photos with light say with sun at sunset are top , you never get it wrong, while in the blue hour there is to understand the operation, hyperlight works and no in the sense that this is also a feature but it works automatically but I do not like to make the automatic devices work so I am not very satisfied, guys the 12 mpx photo is very detailed a bomb the raw and very workable , really great pano in raw. If you still have doubts do not hesitate to contact me sent on December 16, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS Pros: Versatility, good metal construction, diaphragm lenses on the lens like all fuji lenses, contrast, sharpness in the center, contrast and color, fast, precise auto focus, stabilizer. Cons: Focus ring in the manual not precise, sharp edge sharpness even with closed diaphragms f9 f11, flare Opinion: I bought this lens for landscape, since Fuji for now does not have many alternatives, the construction of the lens is impeccable all in metal, the first thing to notice is that the machine and the lens work too well, af speed, precision af, and virtually null distortions like vignetting, what is known after opening files in any photo development program is that the file is being overwritten by software from the machine in an almost extreme way, losing a lot of sharpness to the edges while in the center is very contrasting and sharp, I have also tried with another goal of a friend and the results are almost identical. A little bit of allergic to the back light creates annoying flare difficult to eliminate. Conclusion is a good lens, at the same rate as the Canon 16 35 f4, it probably has a better sharpness in the center of the picture even though it loses some edge, great for those looking for a landscape zoom while waiting to see the new lens that fuji is pulling out 8 16 f2.8, remains the mpolarized wide angle lens in home fujifilm. sent on October 11, 2017 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Pros: Sharpness at f2.8, build quality, weather sealed, blurred, stabilizer Cons: The weight, scattarci freehand for 2 or 3 hours really tired Opinion: The best optics that Canon have never had a sharpness from f2.8 to fear a stabilizer that really helps make many shots in ambient light in the theater or in sports halls and stabilizer is really a boon, the focus is on fear, has a detachment from the subject to dream the only downside is the weight. A word of advice to be missed. sent on July 13, 2014 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: Years later, still the best for fullframe image quality, the rest is already all been said Cons: Ch dirt enters the sensor, there is only one exit honfatto and I send in assistance to clean Opinion: I was torn between 5D3 and 5d2 6d, nn sincerely can not understand why sell such a machine for 6d, or 5D3 is only an opinion of course, but the image quality is better at high iso nn there is so much difference the , only thing is the system that in the end af nn is so scandalous as they say so quoto great for the 5d2. sent on March 06, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
