RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Raoul 70
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Raoul70



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Raoul 70


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_50_f1-8stmCanon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM

Pros: Light, silent and good sharpness

Cons: Focus is an adventure ......

Opinion: What can I say, the quality that returns in comparison with the price deserves a 10 and praise. On full frame has a slight vignetting that corrects in pp, while on reduced sensor disappears. If you want a close-up portrait and a half bust on apsc this is ideal for the crop factor of 1.6 (Canon), with full frame use in the set portrait. I previously owned the 50 USM f / 1.4 which was unusable at TA, it was supposed to close at least af / 2 as the rest of the stm, so for about 100 euro I preferred stm with the hope that mom Canon updates the f / 1.4. The only blatant sin is when you mount the hood, if you want the manual focus becomes a location for the ring location near the hood. I also owned the Sigma 50 art sold by desperation not so much for the b / f focus but because of 10 photos taken I cestinavo 8, but when centering the maf undoubtedly is better than Canon. I read many recessions which it is stated that the 50 USM f / 1.4 is better than stm, maybe minecopy owned was one of those bad releases even if it was recently constructed, or my stm is a perfect output copy. rnBuy for the price of 100/120 euros to buy it you will not regret it.

sent on October 17, 2017


tokina_16-50Tokina AT-X Pro 16-50mm f/2.8 DX

Pros: sharpness

Cons: Discontinued, weight.

Opinion: As they say .... the first love is never forgotten. 7 years ago I bought this lens, then on the advice of a friend convinced me to buy the Nikon 16-85 due to the fact that the 16-50 I had become a little short, I sold the Tokina. The Nikon is a great goal, a little dark but fá his duty. Along the way I realized that the Nikon 16-85 had limitations and today I made 1200 km (round trip) to go to buy the Tokina again, found abroad again, stock fund at a good price. I think this lens with the 90D is a winning combination. The objective is different from Nikon, the colors are more neutral and less saturated, sharpness for sale at room temperature and if closed to 1-2 stop has the best yield. In my gallery I posted today a picture taken in AV mode to ISO 640 free hand and was walking. One shot knocked them as evidence, without intervening in raw pp, only conversion jpeg.rnIl My advice if you have the opportunity to source new stock fund to a prezzaccio not pensarch 2 times to buy.

sent on November 11, 2016


nikon_16-85dxNikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR

Pros: good sharpness

Cons: Little light, thin lens hood

Opinion: I was reading reviews about this goal, a user said that found no difference between the 18-105 ..... now I wonder: who made this recession sá least like you're holding an SLR? !!!! RnIo I own it and I can assure you that this is very good buy and the price that it costs is worth them all. I make this objective the comparison with a Tokina 16-50 f / 2.8 and I can say that the difference in sunny days is minimal, certainly in poor lighting conditions on the Tokina vince.rnPer me is one of the successful end of mediocre goals home Nikon.rn

sent on November 11, 2016


nikon_18-105dx_vrNikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR

Pros: Good sharpness if closed

Cons: Plasticotto

Opinion: Even if it is a lens to kit it gave me much better yield soddisfazioni.La is f / 8, of course it is not bright but if we take in good lighting conditions favorable is equivalent to a major cost goal. The score of 7.5 does not adapt to this lens I would have given a few points more. rnHo bed recessions made by users about other goals with rating of 9.2 out of bottle bottoms true and propylene.

sent on November 09, 2016


nikon_d90Nikon D90

Pros: excellent

Cons: Too many features that you always posting to a point.

Opinion: I have 3 changed because now they were the fruit. In 2015 I found a new one in a warehouse (it was a stock fund) and I bought back. I was undecided whether to buy an old out of production SLR or a newer model, I finally decided for the old, the rest of "old chicken makes good soup" ..... RNA part that at the time it took me 10 days before of the manual to study me with the settings he rerouted from one page, then with the experience I was able to set it as efficiently as possible. What can I say ....... excellent reflex, gave me a lot of satisfaction, only flaw is the 18-105 lens kit that leaves desired. In the flea market they are to be found at an affordable price and advice for users who want to enter the world of photography provided you do not get angry if it is not found the perfect setting. Great camera body when paired with a bright lens.

sent on November 05, 2016




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me